Writing out umm instead of thinking it and saying u when you mean "you" aren't the artifacts of different nationalities and the way they communicate. They are the artifacts of lower quality English language communities like facebook.

The post is jarring because it says nothing of substance and it says it badly. Prompting people to communicate better is worth doing.

>Writing out umm instead of thinking it and saying u when you mean "you" aren't the artifacts of different nationalities and the way they communicate. They are the artifacts of lower quality English language communities like facebook.

That's just wrong. I don't know what to tell you.

I'm from Ghana, if you took 10 random online posts from friends without names and showed them to me, I could easily tell you which ones are my Ghanian friends and which ones are my American friends.

In general, different countries have different cultures about everything from emoticons to grammar online. It's telling that you didn't realize this.

I take issue with "lower quality". Who is wise enough to judge? I say English is exactly how i write it. Or speak it. English is not stagnant. The epitome of high quality in your head now. Will be as quaint as chaucer in time to come.

I always have a problem (me-my problem, not the other party's) when ome missuses the language, written or spoken, to spin something around and says A --> means B, "because language is a living thing and meanings change" to suit their message, but not the truth. The parent message was flagged, thus I didn't have a chance to read it, but from the above comments and your comments I get it that.

> English is not stagnant

No it's not, but potato means potato, and cancer means cancer. How you read it or speak it is your thing. And one of Quality's definitions is: "compliance to specifications".

I would like to believe that the audience here is mostly high quality audience, I have to admit that language barriers exist that would make some people seem less eloquent, but by your definition we'll end up having "Idiocracy" (what humour, food, health, etc. may become).

I think that "Idiocracy" idea is highly elitist. I'd for us to all be reading in search of lost time in the evenings. But hey playing fortnite n instagramming are the current consensus right? Who am i to say fortnite n instagram are low quality past times for idiots?

And inflammable means flammable...

The fluid nature of the future evolution of the English language is hardly an excuse not to communicate according to a reasonable set of standards now much less a reason to deny any standards exist.

I guess you're entitled to your opinions too!

But yes. Doing things like not starting sentences with "because". Not writing down the ums n ers. Seem to go well with old folks.

But ya. Usually i dun run things with the -vvv flag.

There's a spec for english? Ooops i didnt get the memo. I also hate it when ppl say "cheaters". So? Thats the current consensus thats all. We'll go back to calling them cheats when we feel like it again.

And indeed i don't come from an occidental country. English is not my native language.

In fact. Bullying small firms is easier. They probably don't have the resources to fight back. But monsanto are like professional evil doers. Surely they have whole departments dedicated to doing whatever she's accusing them of doing.

I'm only saying I'm surprised that the author was surprised. If you go poking tigers with sticks. Then at least be prepared to get bitten.

I mean. Is the author naive? Gullible? Or just having a professional need to submit an article? C'mon. She's saying bad things about them. She's saying they're bad folks. And she's expecting them to not at least reply in kind?

The thing is that they ARE bad folks in much the same way that the Cigarette companies were and are bad folks. We needed people that are better folks than you or I that are capable and willing to suffer personal hardship to make the world a slightly less shitty place.

I dunno what the world needs. But i think its interesting that she thinks criticism is a 1 way street. She can criticise monsanto. Thats it?

Why are you so emotionally invested in defending an evil megacorp?

Am i? Have i? I only think that was a pointless article....she's surprised the tiger bit her after she poked it with a stick?

Why are you so worked up about the english grammar?