Re:Inflated Bond Ratings Helped Spur the Financial Crisis. T...
by mochomocha on Wednesday August 07, 2019 @10:42PM
(#20641362)
For 90% of the cases that interest mainstream media, economics is not a science because proper experiments cannot be run. You cannot have clean counterfactuals and no "A/B testing" setup to validate hypothesis in most interesting cases of dramatic economic events (like a recession). Most theories end up being... theories, with weak validation based on dubious instrumental variables, if any are considered at all.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Inflated Bond Ratings Helped Spur the Financial Crisis. T...
by bacon_waffle on Thursday August 08, 2019 @12:47AM
(#20641927)
Being unable to run those sorts of experiments doesn't disqualify a field from being a Science - consider astrophysics.
I think the issue here is more that economics is describing human behaviour, and we don't fit well in to a mathematical formula.
Re:Inflated Bond Ratings Helped Spur the Financial Crisis. T...
by klodolph on Thursday August 08, 2019 @03:31AM
(#20642541)
This is exactly correct. But the issue that “humans don’t fit well to a mathematical formula” is also true of everything that you don’t describe with quantum field theory. Even chemistry is full of this.
Re:Inflated Bond Ratings Helped Spur the Financial Crisis. T...
by philipps on Thursday August 08, 2019 @07:34AM
(#20643522)
A key aspect of the scientific method is that claims can be demonstrated to be not true (it doesn’t matter if the demonstration is done in a lab or not).
Re:Inflated Bond Ratings Helped Spur the Financial Crisis. T...
by notfromhere on Thursday August 08, 2019 @09:49AM
(#20644510)
You do understand that economists run experiments all the time, right?