News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Side channel that leaked data from Intel CPUs patched by ... by ailideex on Wednesday August 07, 2019 @12:40AM (#20632014)
> Back in the 90s and early 2000s we thought anything can be hacked by any clever person.

We did?

Re:Side channel that leaked data from Intel CPUs patched by ... by tinco on Wednesday August 07, 2019 @03:26AM (#20632638)
Yes.. Windows XP had an unending list of vulnerabilities, software patch policies were often horrible, hardware with outdated software was everywhere. Back then if you would call yourself a hacker or a hack group it would mean you had multiple 0day exploits under your sleeve for operating systems, browsers and web apps.

Even if you were just a lowly scriptkiddie, because of the bad update policies you could just go to an exploit website, like metasploit is now, and try out the list of old exploits on any target you were interested in. A friend of mine had 40.000 routers in some Scandinavian country because their ISP shipped them to customers with a 4 year old BSD release that had known vulnerabilities in it.

Re:Side channel that leaked data from Intel CPUs patched by ... by pjmlp on Wednesday August 07, 2019 @04:58AM (#20633010)
Re:Side channel that leaked data from Intel CPUs patched by ... by ailideex on Wednesday August 07, 2019 @03:35AM (#20632665)
Maybe I am just pedantic but "many things" != "anything" and the existence of vulnerable systems does not invalidate the existence of secure systems.
Re:Side channel that leaked data from Intel CPUs patched by ... by jotm on Wednesday August 07, 2019 @03:55AM (#20632753)
Gotta admit, it was fun "hacking" all the WPS-enabled access points around me.
Re:Side channel that leaked data from Intel CPUs patched by ... by swebs on Wednesday August 07, 2019 @09:13AM (#20634364)
Pretty much. Security wasn't really seen as something developers worried about back then. Maybe it was because there were less bad actors due to it being much harder to make a buck through hacking. I remember setting up a server with an extremely weak SSH password around 2003 and it went for months without receiving any sort of traffic at all, much less login attempts. Nowadays if you set up a server with port 22 open you'll get dozens of hits per day from various bots scanning the entire IPV4 range and trying dictionary attacks to get in. Going through Fail2ban logs can be pretty entertaining.
Re:Side channel that leaked data from Intel CPUs patched by ... by dylan604 on Wednesday August 07, 2019 @01:23AM (#20632173)
I was thinking that might have been true back in the 80s. Hell, I still feel that way about anything analog. It's just nothing is really analog any more. Once things went digital and encryption was implemented, things just became more of a social engineering type of hack to get people to give you the information to walk in the front door. It's not that you hacked the Gibson or anything. Also, modern systems just don't have the cool 3D interfaces that all of the systems from the 80s/90s had ;-)
Re:Side channel that leaked data from Intel CPUs patched by ... by nesadi on Wednesday August 07, 2019 @07:15AM (#20633646)
It wasn't really until Windows 7 that Windows was to some degree secure as an internet-capable platform. XP was just terrible from a security standpoint until SP2 (2 years after launch), which at least added a decent firewall that was enabled by default.