News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:PyPy JIT for 64-bit ARM by gok on Sunday July 28, 2019 @04:26PM (#20549664)
PyPy is a little bit of a pathological case of their benchmark suite requires that much DRAM though
Re:PyPy JIT for 64-bit ARM by hawski on Sunday July 28, 2019 @05:20PM (#20549901)
SolidRun has a MiniITX board supporting up to 2x32GB for around $1000 [0]. They also have a preproduction units for another board for $550 supporting as much RAM [1].

They probably had their reasons, but I'm just showing what's available.

https://www.solid-run.com/product/SRLX216S00D00GE064C13CH/

https://www.solid-run.com/nxp-lx2160a-family/honeycomb-works...

Re:PyPy JIT for 64-bit ARM by rjsw on Sunday July 28, 2019 @05:58PM (#20550050)
Why does the benchmark suite need so much RAM ?

I would expect benchmarks to match typical usage, if PyPy can't run in a couple of GB then choose a better language.

Re:PyPy JIT for 64-bit ARM by Nelson69 on Sunday July 28, 2019 @06:41PM (#20550220)
Compiling pypy is memory intensive, I don't believe it can be done in 2GB which is where most of the really affordable ARM devices seem to cap out.
Re:PyPy JIT for 64-bit ARM by comex on Sunday July 28, 2019 @10:02PM (#20550954)
But why do you have to compile PyPy on the same machine you’re testing it on?
Re:PyPy JIT for 64-bit ARM by gok on Monday July 29, 2019 @03:11PM (#20558240)
Well cross-compiling (aka "cross translation) is made complicated because PyPy doesn't use a normal toolchain, but that's not the problem here. The PyPy benchmark suite itself takes that much memory to run.
Re:PyPy JIT for 64-bit ARM by rjsw on Sunday July 28, 2019 @07:56PM (#20550503)
You can build OpenJDK with the Hotspot JIT on a 2GB ARM64 system.