News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Man Who Built the Retweet: “We Handed a Loaded Weapon to ... by azinman2 on Thursday July 25, 2019 @12:24PM (#20526705)
The difference is that lowering friction to perform an action has caused an exponential increase in its usage... and it’s so associated with cognitive bias and impulsive thinking that it’s allowed a lot of false information to spread quickly.

I say let people go back to the manual RT

Re:Man Who Built the Retweet: “We Handed a Loaded Weapon to ... by dmix on Thursday July 25, 2019 @12:36PM (#20526827)
Was there really that big of a different between “via @user” and “RT” and the retweet button?
Re:Man Who Built the Retweet: “We Handed a Loaded Weapon to ... by ascagnel_ on Thursday July 25, 2019 @12:43PM (#20526900)
User interaction drops dramatically with each extra click required -- I don't think it's hard to extrapolate that an action that involves at least two additional clicks (select text than focus the input), plus keying in text, pasting text, and reformatting pasted text to fit fewer available characters would greatly drop the rate of retweets.
Re:Man Who Built the Retweet: “We Handed a Loaded Weapon to ... by UnFleshedOne on Thursday July 25, 2019 @01:03PM (#20527191)
I think similar mechanism explains why some diseases blow up into epidemic and some fizzle out. Epidemiologists have all the hard math on just how much friction is needed.
Re:Man Who Built the Retweet: “We Handed a Loaded Weapon to ... by creaghpatr on Thursday July 25, 2019 @01:09PM (#20527260)
Psychologically speaking, I always felt the original RT kind of forced the RTer to put the words into their own mouth.
Re:Man Who Built the Retweet: “We Handed a Loaded Weapon to ... by smacktoward on Thursday July 25, 2019 @12:40PM (#20526871)
Taking something that required thought and typing and turning it into a one-click, no-thought-required operation? Absolutely.

Jeff Bezos certainly thinks so -- why else would he have bothered patenting one-click buying?