News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook revenue beats estimates; discloses antitrust probe by threeseed on Wednesday July 24, 2019 @05:00PM (#20519635)
You do understand these documents are vetted by accountants, lawyers, compliance officers etc.

It is highly unlikely they are falsely claiming those numbers. What is likely is that they are including loose interactions e.g. OAuth Login as MAUs.

Re:Facebook revenue beats estimates; discloses antitrust probe by mtmail on Wednesday July 24, 2019 @05:23PM (#20519889)
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/monthly-active-user-mau...

"Facebook revised its definition of MAU: It would no longer include "third-party pings"—that is, people who are not active Facebook users, but who share content only via another site that's integrated within the Facebook login."

Re:Facebook revenue beats estimates; discloses antitrust probe by bliteben on Wednesday July 24, 2019 @05:02PM (#20519658)
Re:Facebook revenue beats estimates; discloses antitrust probe by darawk on Wednesday July 24, 2019 @05:04PM (#20519677)
What is it that you think the 10Q says that validates your claim that these numbers are false?
Re:Facebook revenue beats estimates; discloses antitrust probe by bliteben on Wednesday July 24, 2019 @05:08PM (#20519726)
We define a monthly active user as a registered Facebook user who logged in and visited Facebook through our website or a mobile device, or used our Messenger application (and is also a registered Facebook user), in the last 30 days as of the date of measurement. MAUs are a measure of the size of our global active user community on Facebook.

They do mention that they think 11% of their accounts are duplicates. But even then I think the numbers smell off.

Re:Facebook revenue beats estimates; discloses antitrust probe by rolltiide on Wednesday July 24, 2019 @05:09PM (#20519741)
You act like big ‘vetted’ companies have never restated earnings for prior quarters years after the fact

It looks fishy