News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation by caust1c on Wednesday June 19, 2019 @09:09PM (#20228912)
Their moat is sticky?

They were simply the first company to do hosted chat well enough that it didn't constantly piss people off. I wouldn't call that a sticky moat.

Re:Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation by Spooky23 on Wednesday June 19, 2019 @09:34PM (#20229032)
They haven’t fucked up hosted chat yet, which is the benchmark.

There is no chat/IM client on the market today that is superior to the pinnacle, which was circa-2000 AOL Instant Messenger. Every platform gets worse every year, except slack.

Re:Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation by pnathan on Wednesday June 19, 2019 @10:02PM (#20229169)
> They haven’t fucked up hosted chat yet, which is the benchmark.

well put - and - even more so: hosted business chat. all they have to do is keep on keeping on.

Re:Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation by dillonmckay on Wednesday June 19, 2019 @10:19PM (#20229264)
ICQ was quite impressive in 1997.
Re:Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation by crummy on Thursday June 20, 2019 @02:22AM (#20230404)
ICQ offered offline delivery, which was missing from many chat apps for a long time, too.
Re:Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation by rtkwe on Wednesday June 19, 2019 @09:32PM (#20229023)
Wouldn't the Slack bot integration provide a better moat. If they can get orgs using a lot of bots for CI reporting, etc switching gets more difficult at least. Not sure how many teams get that tightly integrated with bots though.
Re:Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation by aeternus on Thursday June 20, 2019 @12:17AM (#20229816)
Notifications are easy, do many companies really use more advanced bots?
Re:Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation by rtkwe on Thursday June 20, 2019 @09:40AM (#20232802)
I don't really know I've been at the same company for a while and we've only used Skype for Business and before that Sametime for our chat infrastructure. I've seen a couple articles written about making them but not sure how many people actually use similar bots with the ability to kick things off or change things.
Re:Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation by dmitriid on Thursday June 20, 2019 @01:37AM (#20230199)
Notifications are easy if the integrations exist.
Re:Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation by notatoad on Thursday June 20, 2019 @01:54AM (#20230281)
Building the integrations is easy, if all the integration is is a notification. I've got half a dozen custom slack integrations that i've written for my team, it's no more than a day of work sunk in so far, including the infrastructure in our product to figure out who, what and when to notify.

If we need to switch to a different messaging platform, sending that same notification at a different api should be pretty trivial. And if it isn't, I don't know why we'd be switching.

Re:Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation by dmitriid on Friday June 21, 2019 @03:08PM (#20245446)
Building an integration is having someone:

- deal with the target platform's API

- deal with APIs of the many platforms that are being integrated

- maintenance and SLAs

I honestly doubt you can create half a dozen good integrations that require more than just notifications in a channel (for example, PagerDuty notifications and the like).