Re:Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation
by aeternus on Thursday June 20, 2019 @12:17AM
(#20229816)
Notifications are easy, do many companies really use more advanced bots?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation
by rtkwe on Thursday June 20, 2019 @09:40AM
(#20232802)
I don't really know I've been at the same company for a while and we've only used Skype for Business and before that Sametime for our chat infrastructure. I've seen a couple articles written about making them but not sure how many people actually use similar bots with the ability to kick things off or change things.
Re:Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation
by dmitriid on Thursday June 20, 2019 @01:37AM
(#20230199)
Notifications are easy if the integrations exist.
Re:Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation
by notatoad on Thursday June 20, 2019 @01:54AM
(#20230281)
Building the integrations is easy, if all the integration is is a notification. I've got half a dozen custom slack integrations that i've written for my team, it's no more than a day of work sunk in so far, including the infrastructure in our product to figure out who, what and when to notify.
If we need to switch to a different messaging platform, sending that same notification at a different api should be pretty trivial. And if it isn't, I don't know why we'd be switching.
Re:Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation
by dmitriid on Friday June 21, 2019 @03:08PM
(#20245446)
Building an integration is having someone:
- deal with the target platform's API
- deal with APIs of the many platforms that are being integrated
- maintenance and SLAs
I honestly doubt you can create half a dozen good integrations that require more than just notifications in a channel (for example, PagerDuty notifications and the like).