News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap... by jrvxo on Monday June 17, 2019 @04:06PM (#20206791)
As an end user, am I happy that Apple took your idea and built it in the OS, stripped of ads, premium features, tracking and analytics, etc? Yes, yes I am.
Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap... by nerdjon on Monday June 17, 2019 @04:13PM (#20206846)
Honestly so am I, this sounds like a privacy nightmare. Sending all traffic through their servers specifically for the purpose of tracking what you're doing.

Isn't this one of the things Apple was upset at Facebook over (including the fact that they went around the App Store) since they don't allow this sort of tracking?

So maybe them building the feature is not the only reason they removed your app?

Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap... by username3 on Monday June 17, 2019 @04:31PM (#20207027)
What is Apple’s app for tracking social network activity?
Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap... by dmlittle on Monday June 17, 2019 @04:38PM (#20207097)
It's Screen Time and you can find it under Settings > Screen Time. It doesn't really track social network activity as much as iOS app usage by app categories (it can't tell if you were writing a post, browsing images, etc.).
Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap... by rhinoceraptor on Monday June 17, 2019 @04:34PM (#20207056)
Screen time, it's in the settings app.
Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap... by namesbc on Monday June 17, 2019 @04:32PM (#20207032)
This type of app would have been possible to build without a VPN on any other OS. Apple has chosen to make it difficult for anyone other than themselves to build such apps.

This is an abuse of market position in one market to expand in another, and has a long term negative effect on the health of the industry if only the large players that own the ecosystem can profit from it.

Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap... by scarface74 on Monday June 17, 2019 @04:41PM (#20207150)
So you’re okay with all of your personal information going through a third party whose explicit aim is to monetize the analytics?
Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap... by rhinoceraptor on Monday June 17, 2019 @04:38PM (#20207106)
Do you really want 3rd party developers to be able to write apps that can introspect all other apps running on a phone?
Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap... by lacker on Monday June 17, 2019 @04:42PM (#20207157)
Yes. "top" and "ps" are pretty useful tools.
Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap... by rhinoceraptor on Monday June 17, 2019 @04:49PM (#20207224)
Those are developer tools, so of course they need to do things you would never want Slack to do, for example. Also, Apple themselves ported Dtrace to MacOS. If you want the ultimate computing surveillance tool, Dtrace is a good bet.
Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap... by kstrauser on Monday June 17, 2019 @04:43PM (#20207158)
Sandboxing apps (and implementing other strong security mechanisms) is not an abuse of market position.
Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap... by Waterluvian on Monday June 17, 2019 @04:26PM (#20206972)
Surely they had a meeting at some point and discussed and weighed this and many other risks.

I don't see anything wrong here. They just got a really frustrating outcome.

Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap... by layoutIfNeeded on Monday June 17, 2019 @04:28PM (#20206999)
This.

Can’t wait to hear the same complaint from authors of period tracker apps, once iOS 13 is released with the built-in period tracker.

Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap... by EGreg on Monday June 17, 2019 @04:27PM (#20206980)
Socialism!

Just kidding. But it seems that it’s the same mindset that likes the government replacing, say, private insurers, ISPs and other private enterprise.

As for me, I do not consider giant publicly traded corporations “private” any more than cities or states.

[dead]
Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap... by asavadatti on Monday June 17, 2019 @04:42PM (#20207151)
One can be both
Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap... by ALittleLight on Monday June 17, 2019 @04:28PM (#20206988)
Developers should care about the end user though.
[dead]
Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap... by dang on Monday June 17, 2019 @05:07PM (#20207401)
Please don't do personal attacks on HN, even if you sense schadenfreude. It doesn't help, and only makes this place worse.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap... by Bakary on Monday June 17, 2019 @04:17PM (#20206879)
Is his argument wrong, though? It's unclear why we should automatically feel sympathy for the author.
Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap... by babyslothzoo on Monday June 17, 2019 @04:27PM (#20206979)
I'm specifically referencing the clear schadenfreude.
Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap... by IkmoIkmo on Monday June 17, 2019 @04:26PM (#20206967)
I think that's fine. What's not fine is removing the app itself from the app store as it was generating $45k a year, the same week of releasing its competing app.

Either you remove it because it's against the TOS, anytime in the 1.5 years that the app existed, or leave it be. Don't 'coincidentally' remove it the same week you release a competing app. That's just nonsense.

Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap... by scarface74 on Monday June 17, 2019 @04:29PM (#20207003)
I don’t care how much it was generating. It was a severe invasion of privacy. If that’s how they made their money, nothing of value was lost.
Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap... by Jack000 on Monday June 17, 2019 @04:38PM (#20207100)
It's an invasion of privacy if the tracking is unsolicited. It's not an invasion of privacy if the tracking is the point of the app.

The app had paying users, it clearly had value to some people.

Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap... by rhinoceraptor on Monday June 17, 2019 @04:40PM (#20207131)
The average user will not understand the implications of the tracking. And even if the tracking is benevolent today, who's to say that won't change when the company is acquired in six months?
Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap... by scarface74 on Monday June 17, 2019 @04:42PM (#20207154)
See Onava.
Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap... by em-bee on Monday June 17, 2019 @11:58PM (#20209662)
then it should have never been allowed in the first place
Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap... by scarface74 on Tuesday June 18, 2019 @06:20AM (#20211359)
So Apple should have thought of every possible rule when the App Store opened in mid 2008?
Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap... by em-bee on Wednesday June 19, 2019 @12:05PM (#20224533)
well no, but the removal of permissions could come with some warning so that developers have time to adapt and find other ways to solve the problem. if the developers would have known ahead of time they would have been able to invest their efforts into other directions.
Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap... by matt-attack on Monday June 17, 2019 @04:31PM (#20207017)
The problem is that the moment iOS released Screen Time, their app instantly sat in violation of the TOS. You cannot recreate built-in functionality.
Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap... by scarface74 on Monday June 17, 2019 @04:44PM (#20207173)
I don’t know why this keeps coming up. There are apps that “duplicate” note, reminders, music, calendar, video, podcasts, etc.

There are even Siri Intents for most of them and many more in iOS 13.

Re:We launched an app with $500k annual revenue, and then Ap... by ihuman on Monday June 17, 2019 @04:28PM (#20206990)
It was removed after the feature was announced because that was also when they changed the App Store guidelines. Previously it did not violate the rules.