News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on James Webb Space Telescope emerges successfully from final thermal vacuum test. Parent comment

Re:James Webb Space Telescope emerges successfully from fina... by GlenTheMachine on Friday May 31, 2019 @12:48PM (#20062583)
We would probably do this robotically.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:James Webb Space Telescope emerges successfully from fina... by ethbro on Friday May 31, 2019 @01:32PM (#20063060)
"What do we do when the robotic satellite fails?"

"Send another robot!"

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:James Webb Space Telescope emerges successfully from fina... by GlenTheMachine on Friday May 31, 2019 @01:39PM (#20063142)
https://sspd.gsfc.nasa.gov/restore-L.html

also

https://www.darpa.mil/program/robotic-servicing-of-geosynchr...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:James Webb Space Telescope emerges successfully from fina... by jvanderbot on Friday May 31, 2019 @05:28PM (#20065147)
Thank you. I was hoping to post these!
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:James Webb Space Telescope emerges successfully from fina... by Buttons840 on Friday May 31, 2019 @09:00PM (#20066421)
"What do we do when the L2 point is filled with broken robots?"

Could that happen?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:James Webb Space Telescope emerges successfully from fina... by GlenTheMachine on Saturday June 01, 2019 @07:19PM (#20072400)
Unclear. L2 is an unstable Lagrange point, so the robots wouldn't just stay put. But that doesn't mean they would leave, either, necessarily. They could end up in funky Lissajous orbits and go flying through L2 regularly.

The orbital mechanics around Lagrange points are weird.

[ Parent | on HN ]