Static web – back to the roots?

Re:Static web – back to the roots? by lwhsiao on Saturday May 25, 2019 @03:15AM (#20007566)

I'd also note that there are CMSs for static sites like forestry.io or Netlify CMS which gives more of a WYSIWYG for non-technical contributors.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Static web – back to the roots? by sgallant on Saturday May 25, 2019 @09:40AM (#20008984)

Co-founder of https://forestry.io here. The author describes how writers can use branch logic (i.e. merging as an editorial tool). We're currently building multi-branch support into our CMS for just this. If you want early access, reach out to scott[at]forestry.io

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Static web – back to the roots? by kabacha on Saturday May 25, 2019 @03:56AM (#20007662)

Lektor[1] static website generator (Python) supports WYSIWYG

1 - https://github.com/lektor/lektor

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Static web – back to the roots? by icebraining on Saturday May 25, 2019 @04:49AM (#20007811)

Also Movable Type, which has been around since 2001.

[ Parent | on HN ]