News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Lsd: The next gen ls command by superconformist on Monday May 20, 2019 @11:25PM (#19967371)
It doesn't install a man page for itself, requires weird-ass fonts, has a fraction of the features of the real ls [0], and runs about half as fast ...

However it's written in our lord and savior RUST and has lots of colors so this shit is definitely "next gen."

0: http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/ls...

Re:Lsd: The next gen ls command by dang on Tuesday May 21, 2019 @01:13AM (#19967694)
Would you please stop posting snarky comments here? The site guidelines explicitly ask you not to: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.
Re:Lsd: The next gen ls command by saagarjha on Tuesday May 21, 2019 @12:20AM (#19967544)
I'd call this a "shallow dismissal" (https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html): perhaps you could reword your response to be a bit nicer?
Re:Lsd: The next gen ls command by paulddraper on Tuesday May 21, 2019 @12:49AM (#19967626)
I think there was a number of reasons given.
Re:Lsd: The next gen ls command by saagarjha on Tuesday May 21, 2019 @01:10AM (#19967683)
It wasn't particularly nice, though, and I'm not quite sure all of the comments given qualify as non-shallow.
Re:Lsd: The next gen ls command by hermanradtke on Tuesday May 21, 2019 @12:00AM (#19967485)
I will stick with exa instead. https://github.com/ogham/exa
Re:Lsd: The next gen ls command by guytv on Tuesday May 21, 2019 @08:17AM (#19969426)
I am using exa now, and was wondering the same thing. Could you explain why you made the decision? what's the difference?
Re:Lsd: The next gen ls command by shaklee3 on Tuesday May 21, 2019 @12:36AM (#19967585)
I would try it if @burntsushi wrote it...
Re:Lsd: The next gen ls command by echelon on Tuesday May 21, 2019 @12:00AM (#19967486)
> our lord and savior RUST

So you're using this as an opportunity to bash an entire language ecosystem? The merits of this project have no bearing on Rust or its adoption.

Re:Lsd: The next gen ls command by bobbylarrybobby on Tuesday May 21, 2019 @12:27AM (#19967562)
I think they were referring to the fact that when a new popular language arises, people rush to build things in that language and then act as if the language itself is sufficient to make the resulting product good instead of any inherent merits.
Re:Lsd: The next gen ls command by paulddraper on Tuesday May 21, 2019 @12:54AM (#19967637)
I don't think the parent was bashing Rust.

I think the parent was bashing the attendant hype and the resulting reinventions but worse.

There was a blog I read about the Rust Zealot Brigade (or similar name) that would reliably descend on any HN conversation.

Re:Lsd: The next gen ls command by mkgolden on Tuesday May 21, 2019 @12:33AM (#19967581)
I'm geekin lol