Ford is in debt 154 billion as of 2017, with an unclear path to an electric future (other than Rivian's help). I'd be more worried about them making it in the next 5 years.

By what definition? The chance of bankruptcy over the next five years is undoubtedly higher for Tesla. I think you are grossly misrepresenting Ford's balance sheet:

https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/f/financials/bal...

Tesla is valued in large part based on the kind of math you'd commonly see applied to a VC backed company three orders of magnitude smaller; multiplying a large payoff value by a small chance of success.

People are making a bet on it becoming a trillion dollar behemoth that snatches tons of market share from energy and automobile companies during the turbulent switch over to renewable energy.

If you're confident in their execution, it's worth it to have Tesla swing for the fences chasing this vision even if there's a large chance of failure. Assuming of course you have diversified - I think you'd have to have a screw loose to go all in.

This is wildly misleading. Ford's debt mostly comes from it's financing arm. The name of the game there is to borrow money at a low interest rate and lend it out at a high one. The more debt Ford has the more money its making.

you really think tesla has a better chance of surviving than ford in the next 5 years?

They both look good to me. Ford is taking all the right steps to transition while keeping their current product relevant.

Tesla has a clear path forward, they are just raising to start Model Y, Semi and Pickup production.

Yes.

Tesla is just alive because the crisis haven't arrived yet. As soon as a lot of investors hit the breaks, a lot of those companies will go away... or become profitable.

Still easily doable by Apple, if they only wanted to.

Apple could do it, sure. I personally think they're the most likely candidate of any potential acquirer.

But fundamentally, an acquisition of this nature is a simple build vs buy decision. In a situation where Tesla is ready to undergo a fire sale, its R&D will have already been cut to the bone.

If Tesla stagnates technically, "build" becomes infinitely more attractive; you're no longer desperately chasing a moving target, you're simply replicating what is known to work. Companies that can do this (as opposed to original R&D) are a dime a dozen.

If the company is still healthy, I just don't see who would have the means and motive to acquire it.

Doable by companies like Apple/Google, the issue is why would they do it? Their shareholders would not approve such transaction as it's just throwing your money into a furnace.

Doable by a lot of companies if they wanted to, I think the suggestion was that someone in the domain would make the acquisition, which seems much tougher a prospect.

Larry Ellison invested in TSLA. I would not want to see Oracle buy them.

Model 3 suddenly cost $1,000 per wheel and come with a mandatory $40k/year support package, but don't worry, your rep got you a sweet 7.5% discount on future services — and he's never heard of a director approving such an incredible discount.

Hmm maybe TSLA should leverage Oracle for corp. fleet sales :)