Re:The Moral Order of Panera
by mikestew on Thursday April 18, 2019 @10:06AM
(#19691072)
You...”doubt it”? I guess the issue is settled, then. I’ll take it that the underlying argument is “government bad, private good”. It doesn’t really contribute anything, but at least we can guess at the reasoning.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
"Doubt it" is pretty much a clear invitation to present arguments. But you are welcome to present some sarcasm instead, even if very general.
"Doubt it" is pretty much a clear invitation to present arguments.
Present an argue against what? “Is not!” doesn’t give a lot to work with. “Doubt it” does a fine job of presenting one’s biases, but it is most certainly not an invitation to stimulating discussion, quite the opposite.
To sum it up.
Starting point: A produces more good then B.
Me: A can produce more good than B, but not necessary more per dollar spent, and I think it's not the case.
--Here was a place to to try to prove it's more per dollar spent--
You: You are biased!
Me: You are invited to present arguments.
You: You are biased!