News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Moral Order of Panera by freshm087 on Thursday April 18, 2019 @11:10PM (#19696819)
"Doubt it" is pretty much a clear invitation to present arguments. But you are welcome to present some sarcasm instead, even if very general.
Re:The Moral Order of Panera by mikestew on Friday April 19, 2019 @09:57AM (#19699632)
"Doubt it" is pretty much a clear invitation to present arguments.

Present an argue against what? “Is not!” doesn’t give a lot to work with. “Doubt it” does a fine job of presenting one’s biases, but it is most certainly not an invitation to stimulating discussion, quite the opposite.

Re:The Moral Order of Panera by freshm087 on Friday April 19, 2019 @05:04PM (#19702989)
To sum it up.

Starting point: A produces more good then B.

Me: A can produce more good than B, but not necessary more per dollar spent, and I think it's not the case.

--Here was a place to to try to prove it's more per dollar spent--

You: You are biased!

Me: You are invited to present arguments.

You: You are biased!