News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did ... by Zimahl on Thursday March 21, 2019 @02:21PM (#19455596)
For those that don't know, the Empire Builder from Seattle stops in Spokane to hook up with a train that is coming from Portland. The combined train then goes all the way to Chicago. If either are delayed it can result in waiting for the other and long delays are apparently the norm and not the exception.

My wife and her grandfather took the train from Portland to Minnesota in the fall of last year. There were a number of issues with the service on the train that make it bad enough, but the speed of the train is a major problem of why these trains are somewhat worthless for travel. Freight trains get priority on the rail lines so many times the train was stopped for possibly hours waiting for freight trains to pass.

On my wife's trip the refrigeration went out at some point so cold food was no longer available, nor was food that required refrigeration before it was cooked. Fortunately they disembarked soon after that happened. The rest of the train was still a day or so from Chicago and those passengers were stuck with god knows what to eat.

Re:There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did ... by stcredzero on Thursday March 21, 2019 @10:38PM (#19459200)
>> We were 8 hours late leaving Seattle and couldn't get into our cabin until we got to Spokane because of some sort of merge of trains coming from Portland and Seattle. Got to Spokane, got our cabin, another 6 hour delay. By the time we reached the upper Midwest, they were rationing food, literally cutting every meal (that we had already paid for) in half. We eventually arrived in Chicago about 22 hours late.

>> The train was disgustingly dirty and the employees were surly and unhelpful.

> On my wife's trip the refrigeration went out at some point so cold food was no longer available, nor was food that required refrigeration before it was cooked. Fortunately they disembarked soon after that happened. The rest of the train was still a day or so from Chicago and those passengers were stuck with god knows what to eat.

Stuff like this makes it feel like the USA is falling apart from being a 1st world nation, crumbling in bits and pieces into a 3rd world one.

Re:There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did ... by rtpg on Thursday March 21, 2019 @11:28PM (#19459403)
US quality of life for many is already pretty close to what you'd see in (granted, middle-class-level) China. The system is able to handle it because a lot of people don't even get to experience how so many other developed nations have a stronger foundation for everyone. They just assume that life sucks and that there isn't a better way.

And even rich people in the US are satisfied with pretty terrible experiences because US culture is so disconnected from everything else that they don't get that things are a lot nicer elsewhere! Nothing like visiting someone's multi-million dollar home with worse plumbing than cheap 1-room studios elsewhere in the world.

Re:There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did ... by PhantomGremlin on Friday March 22, 2019 @12:16AM (#19459561)
Stuff like this makes it feel like the USA is falling apart from being a 1st world nation, crumbling in bits and pieces into a 3rd world one.

That's exactly the wrong take-away!

Amtrak is totally irrelevant for trans-continental travel. There is a "daily" departure from Seattle to Chicago. I.e. one train per day. Probably a few hundred passengers on a good day.

I just did a quick check and there are 7 non-stop flights tomorrow from Seattle to Chicago. Average air travel time is about 4 hours. Cheapest fare for tomorrow is $262.

So this train exists for a few tourists and for a few people who can't or don't want to fly. Everyone else takes a non-stop plane and gets there in hours not in days.

It's an indication of the USA's wealth and bounty that we are willing to waste billions of dollars a year on useless vanity projects like this. Long distance Amtrak runs at a loss, the US congress provides $1.3 billion a year to make up the difference. In addition there is a $650 million subsidy for passenger trains between Washington DC and Boston. That's arguably something useful, since the route is heavily traveled. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2018/03/21/amtrak-gets-n...

Re:There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did ... by stcredzero on Friday March 22, 2019 @12:00PM (#19463809)
It's an indication of the USA's wealth and bounty that we are willing to waste billions of dollars a year on useless vanity projects like this.

It's kind of a "nature preserve" of socialism in the US.

Re:There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did ... by wil421 on Friday March 22, 2019 @09:24AM (#19462274)
No one is taking trains in the US. You can take a MegaBus from Atlanta to New York for like $35. It takes less than the amount of time it takes Amtrak to get from Atlanta to DC. Spirit has a flight for $112 from Atlanta to New York which is the same or less expensive than a train that takes over 20 hours!

In the US, Canada, and Mexico trains are for freight. Even if you’re in the Northeast Corridor a bus is usually a better option if you aren’t driving or flying. Europe uses trucks for freight.

Re:There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did ... by peteretep on Thursday March 21, 2019 @11:24PM (#19459387)
As much as I like trains, the that the passenger ones in the US are crumbling sounds like resources are being efficiently allocated?
Re:There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did ... by Aloha on Thursday March 21, 2019 @04:12PM (#19456745)
Passenger trains do get priority in the US, your mileage may vary by railroad to how forgiving they are for schedule delays.

Basically Amtrak has to keep to a specific schedule, if ut misses it's window it loses the priority it had.

Re:There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did ... by brownindian on Thursday March 21, 2019 @10:56PM (#19459276)
Wendover did a video on this a couple years ago. Basically saying why trains suck in America. And the reason is the same: freight gets priority because Amtrak does not own the track, freight companies do. https://youtu.be/mbEfzuCLoAQ
Re:There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did ... by bobthepanda on Friday March 22, 2019 @04:30PM (#19466590)
It’s the law that passenger trains should get priority, but actual enforcement of this law is nonexistent, and Amtrak does not have as much money to spend on counsel.
Re:There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did ... by Spooky23 on Thursday March 21, 2019 @05:43PM (#19457661)
If you’re on CSX track, you sit. I’ve been on trains that left precisely on schedule that were impacted this way.
Re:There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did ... by nerdponx on Sunday March 24, 2019 @08:25PM (#19479532)
Train service between Utica and Buffalo is routinely affected by this.
Re:There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did ... by pacala on Thursday March 21, 2019 @04:53PM (#19457206)
I took a train from Chicago to LA almost 20 years ago. There were 6 passenger cars attached to 60+ freight cars. There was a 20+ hours delay. All the stops were in dilapidated industrial areas. A ridiculous experience. Never again.

For a transcontinental trip: drive a car or a van.

Re:There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did ... by Aloha on Thursday March 21, 2019 @05:27PM (#19457515)
Amtrak has never run Mixed freight trains, so this must not have been on amtrak.
Re:There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did ... by TkTech on Thursday March 21, 2019 @08:14PM (#19458594)
That is not true, Amtrak used to run a service called Mail & Express. One of the trains was indeed mixed passenger and freight.

That said, Amtrak engines are also often leased to other freight companies so you can frequently see freight trains being hauled by Amtrak branded engines.

Re:There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did ... by Kadin on Thursday March 21, 2019 @09:52PM (#19459028)
In case anyone is interested in Mail and Express:

http://utahrails.net/pass/amtrak-mail-express.htm

It stopped in 2004, presumably due to declines in mail volume. (Which I wonder if it would make sense again now, due to more mail-order package shipping.)

Anyway, it's not really "freight" in the sense that most people think of a freight train. It's all Amtrak rolling stock.

They still do offer Express shipping services between some stations. It's a very cheap way to send something between NYC and Washington for same-day arrival, especially if it's a big box. You have to have someone go to the train station on either end to get your stuff, though. They move them around on the passenger trains that have baggage cars (the 'named' trains, typically at least on the East Coast).

Re:There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did ... by pacala on Friday March 22, 2019 @02:00PM (#19465116)
Alas, the pictures I took were on film, and it's been lost in various relocations. Very likely it was Amtrak, with the "sightseeing car" and all.
Re:There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did ... by sschueller on Saturday March 23, 2019 @05:30AM (#19469757)
You would probably have a better experience renting and entire rail car and shipping it as cargo across the US.
Re:There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did ... by null000 on Friday March 22, 2019 @04:15AM (#19460438)
> Freight trains get priority on the rail lines so many times the train was stopped for possibly hours waiting for freight trains to pass.

This mentality weirds me out. As in: Why are we explicitly valuing the time of companies over the time of actual people? Companies can probably adjust to getting their shit 8 or 12 or 24 hours late (or, if they can't, they can charter a plane). It's a lot harder to deal with for people who need to be somewhere.