News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Continuous Unix commit history from 1970 until today by brazzy on Tuesday March 19, 2019 @08:56AM (#19430301)
> I believe Linus wrote git as a replacement because he got fed up with the commercial licensing (even though they gave free copies to linux devs).

No - BitKeeper revoked the free license because some guy (unrelated to Linux) wrote a client that reverse engineered more features than BitKeeper liked.

And Linux actually used BitKeeper only between 2002 and 2005; prior to that time, it did not use a source control system at all.

Re:Continuous Unix commit history from 1970 until today by self_awareness on Tuesday March 19, 2019 @09:49AM (#19430739)
The BitKeeper reverse engineering is a fun story to read: https://lwn.net/Articles/132938/ (and short!)
Re:Continuous Unix commit history from 1970 until today by black-tea on Tuesday March 19, 2019 @09:54AM (#19430789)
The funny thing is the "reverse engineering" involved telnetting into the server and typing "help".
Re:Continuous Unix commit history from 1970 until today by d4rti on Tuesday March 19, 2019 @11:39AM (#19431827)
And if I recall correctly it sent back SCCS-style data
Re:Continuous Unix commit history from 1970 until today by black-tea on Tuesday March 19, 2019 @09:53AM (#19430774)
They did use a system---tarballs and patches---but it was just a socially constructed system rather than rigorously enforced using software. Linus has often said he would have rather gone back to that system rather than use CVS or SVN.
Re:Continuous Unix commit history from 1970 until today by cryptonector on Tuesday March 19, 2019 @12:53PM (#19432673)
Fortunately instead he created Git. I'm a fan of Git, though I'm aware many aren't.
Re:Continuous Unix commit history from 1970 until today by js2 on Tuesday March 19, 2019 @10:03AM (#19430860)
The "some guy" was Samba/rsync developer Andrew Tridgell.