self_awareness
They are in the dark UX pattern world, squeezing views per second, selling ads. That's all.
The "we give our users something valuable and they will give us profit in return" approach is over since a long time.
Why someone spends time on making this, and why someone would want to spend time using this?
Much more advanced software is available for free for all platforms. Why not just go and install LibreOffice?
Or FileZilla. Or Flashget.
We had this in the 2000's.
And we lost it!
Tatoo is a process of continuous small perforations sometimes for many hours.
If they will be popular, and made inconvenient, you could be forced to use them. Like 2FA in corporate environments; it's forced and you can't do anything else than to put a code every time you login somewhere.
Just wear a baby skin sticker!
So TOTP only targets the situation that user account is compromised. It doesn't help you if the server gets compromised.
I often find myself in situations where someone wants to break the UI I like, because they're used to something else.
It seems that most of the time, "feels right" just means "it works like I'm used to in other software". So: GMail, Outlook, whatever. Which is sad.
I wonder how would you react to "TheBat!" or Pegasus Mail?
How Americans keep straight face in such situations?
I think there are worse clowns in corpos without careers on YouTube.
I mean, eh... last time I checked, this was Hacker news. Yesterday, there was an Ask HN topic on how to enable dark mode on HN. Is this the new hacker culture? Complaining that the resources merely point in some direction instead of specifying details?
But later I've read that there was some kind of Anime called Iczelion (or it was the hero name, whatever). Author also is interested in anime, I guess that's the reason for nickname similarity. Mystery solved.
Maybe this time it'll work.
They un-banned him later, but that was enough to stay away. There are much better services than Antigravity out there.
It only means that >90% of text editors use the wrong UI toolkit for the job. We already had faster editors on the Amiga 500 (CygnusEd) than we have now. The fact that we don't have them now is that we regressed. We had it, and we lost it. It's an entirely different matter from not knowing how to do it!
It's like saying that editor can have full AI support because it can send HTTP requests to an MCP server. But MCP server isn't the end of the problem, it's just a gateway to problems, just like LSP.
For example, jdtls is often times broken, clangd sometimes works, sometimes doesn't. Language servers for ruby are a pain to set up. Some time ago LSP for Dart/Flutter worked under vscode, but not in Vim, because Vim had different assumptions how files should be reported to the LSP. Sometimes is the fault of the server itself, but sometimes the editor isn't fully compatible with some particular LSP server's quirks. It's a mess.
It's not about the style of cursor, or if rope is used or not. We already have answers to that.
It's about remote editing, LSP support.
Do these people use the same template when writing about GUIs? I mean what's complicated about MOC? In CMake it's even transparent and the user doesn't even see it. I swear, the same argument is coming back year after year. "MOC" is complicated, but the compiler itself and ld isn't?