Re:I took 50k images of the night sky to make an 81 Megapixe...
by Waterluvian on Monday February 18, 2019 @08:20AM
(#19190416)
Is it just me or are 4k monitors running in 1080p worse than straight 1080p monitors?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:I took 50k images of the night sky to make an 81 Megapixe...
by systemcluster on Monday February 18, 2019 @08:36AM
(#19190500)
Yes, since neither GPU drivers nor most displays currently support integer scaling. See http://tanalin.com/en/articles/lossless-scaling/ for more a more in-depth explanation.
Re:I took 50k images of the night sky to make an 81 Megapixe...
by Waterluvian on Monday February 18, 2019 @08:49AM
(#19190563)
Fascinating. I assumed that an even multiple is all you need to ensure crispness.
Re:I took 50k images of the night sky to make an 81 Megapixe...
by andy_ppp on Monday February 18, 2019 @08:40AM
(#19190524)
I mean would the display need to know - just GPU drivers should be able to send a 4k signal that has 4px squares each of one colour? Interesting though.
Re:I took 50k images of the night sky to make an 81 Megapixe...
by tpolzer on Monday February 18, 2019 @08:53AM
(#19190577)
It doesn't need to, but it would suffice in case your GPU doesn't manage.
Re:I took 50k images of the night sky to make an 81 Megapixe...
by jmkni on Monday February 18, 2019 @10:10AM
(#19191142)
Well they're usually bigger. IMHO 1080p for monitors maxes out at about 22-24" before it starts to look blurry, after that you want 1440p, until about 28", which is when 4k starts to make sense.
Re:I took 50k images of the night sky to make an 81 Megapixe...
by porphyrogene on Monday February 18, 2019 @08:38AM
(#19190515)
You may need "font smoothing" enabled.
Re:I took 50k images of the night sky to make an 81 Megapixe...
by kowdermeister on Monday February 18, 2019 @08:38AM
(#19190516)
Of course it's worse, since you have more pixels than image data.
Re:I took 50k images of the night sky to make an 81 Megapixe...
by porphyrogene on Monday February 18, 2019 @10:56AM
(#19191558)
By that logic Apple's Retina displays would be worse than non-Retina displays. Down-sampling decreases eye strain and makes the image smoother. It is only an issue when dealing with fine lines that our eyes watch very closely, such as in text.
Re:I took 50k images of the night sky to make an 81 Megapixe...
by kowdermeister on Monday February 18, 2019 @11:11AM
(#19191687)
If you turn your apple retina display to 1080p mode, then I would think it's not that good when there's a 1:1 correspondence between physical pixels and pixel data. However when the size stays the same, I wouldn't expect much difference.
A 32 inch 4k display downsampled to 1080p, well... :)
Re:I took 50k images of the night sky to make an 81 Megapixe...
by porphyrogene on Monday February 18, 2019 @11:25AM
(#19191783)
A down-sampled image has less noise than an image in its native resolution. You can experiment on your own monitors if you don't believe the theory, just remember to use font smoothing for non-native resolutions. You can also ask about it on the appropriate stack exchange, it is a frequent topic of confusion.
Re:I took 50k images of the night sky to make an 81 Megapixe...
by dylan604 on Monday February 18, 2019 @01:24PM
(#19192834)
This is one of the advantages of shooting at a higher resolution than the intended target delivery resolution. When downscaling an image, the noise gets 'averaged' out of the image. For HD 1920x10280, a 2.7K resolution was a good choice before having to jump all the way to 4K. There's other technical reasons as well for shooting larger than intended use, but just re-enforcing the 'noise removal' process of downscaling an image.