News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The shady economics of ‘buy one, get one free’ deals by ChrisSD on Monday February 18, 2019 @05:00AM (#19189661)
> A coffee mug that usually sells for $10 + $3 S&H will go for $13, with FREE shipping.

I actually prefer this. It's much better than shops that activity try to hide shipping costs until the last moment. Also it makes comparing prices quicker.

Re:The shady economics of ‘buy one, get one free’ deals by lgbr on Monday February 18, 2019 @05:20AM (#19189744)
Furthermore, if you want to return the item, you're entitled to a full refund, rather than being forced to pay for shipping for an item you didn't want.
Re:The shady economics of ‘buy one, get one free’ deals by mcv on Monday February 18, 2019 @05:41AM (#19189833)
Shipping cost can vary a lot, though. Especially in the internet age where it's easy to order things abroad. When I order from a Dutch webshop or from amazon.de, shipping is generally free, but when I order from amazon.com, it's not.

So that means the webship has to know where I live and what kind of shipping I want. Granted, Amazon probably already knows this, but when I use a new webshop, they can't know this, and I don't want to have to tell them before I can see the price of their items.

Re:The shady economics of ‘buy one, get one free’ deals by mikeash on Monday February 18, 2019 @10:58AM (#19191564)
What use is it to see the price of the item without knowing the shipping cost? It seems to me that what you’re really saying is that they need to know where you live and what kind of shipping you want before they can show you the real price.
Re:The shady economics of ‘buy one, get one free’ deals by mcv on Monday February 18, 2019 @11:35AM (#19191859)
> What use is it to see the price of the item without knowing the shipping cost?

It's better than not knowing the price until I tell them where I live.

> It seems to me that what you’re really saying is that they need to know where you live and what kind of shipping you want before they can show you the real price.

If they want to include shipping in the price, then yes, they need to know where I live before they can tell me the price. So either they can't tell me the price, or they will change the price after they learn where I live, or they won't change the price and lose money on it, or they may refuse to ship to me. None of these options are in any way reasonable, except maybe not telling me the price, but that's extremely annoying.

Better to not include shipping, tell me shipping is not included, and add shipping later. That way, shipping cost can be the real shipping cost, rather than shipping cost for 1 item times the number of items, which is likely to be more than the real shipping costs.

Re:The shady economics of ‘buy one, get one free’ deals by mikeash on Monday February 18, 2019 @11:41AM (#19191913)
My point is that the only “price” that matters in the end is the total amount you pay, with shipping. If shipping is separate then they’re not really showing you “the price,” they’re just showing you a somewhat arbitrary number that sets a floor on the actual price you’ll pay.
Re:The shady economics of ‘buy one, get one free’ deals by mcv on Monday February 18, 2019 @01:51PM (#19193139)
> My point is that the only “price” that matters in the end is the total amount you pay, with shipping.

Not at all, how that price is built up is extremely relevant. If an item is cheap but shipping is horrendously expensive, I go look if I can find it at another webshop that has more reasonable shipping. Shipping is part of the total price. Pretending it's not is taking information and choice away from the customer.

Re:The shady economics of ‘buy one, get one free’ deals by mikeash on Monday February 18, 2019 @04:20PM (#19194561)
But there is no additional information in the general case. The amount charged for shipping is completely arbitrary. All you’re being told is that the price P is actually the sum of A + B, where A and B are just some amounts.

There are exceptions to this. For example, I trust McMaster-Carr to charge me whatever they get charged for shipping, which is good because they won’t tell you in advance what it will cost. But in general it’s just another number. It’s a really common scam to have a cheap item with expensive shipping in order to trick people who aren’t paying close enough attention.

Put it this way: store A is selling widget X for $40 with “free shipping,” store B sells it for $35 plus $5 shipping, and store C is $15 plus $25 shipping. Who do you buy from?

Re:The shady economics of ‘buy one, get one free’ deals by mcv on Monday February 18, 2019 @05:43PM (#19195168)
By that argument everything is "just a number". It's still part of the sum.

For example, if C sells something else that I want that's also much cheaper than a the other shops, and it won't increase shipping costs much, then that's the better option. If not, I may continue to shop around until I find a shop that combines low item price with reasonable shipping cost.

Re:The shady economics of ‘buy one, get one free’ deals by mikeash on Monday February 18, 2019 @07:03PM (#19195634)
The sum is all that matters. The rest is just a weird number game.

As you say, your store preference depends on various factors. If C’s shipping costs are structured one way, you’ll prefer them. Another way, you won’t. You have to know all those details before you can choose. That’s my point: ultimately, functionally, there is no difference between a random store that won’t show you prices until you give them your location, and a ransom store that shows prices immediately but won’t give you shipping costs until you give them your location.

Re:The shady economics of ‘buy one, get one free’ deals by dalai on Monday February 18, 2019 @05:09AM (#19189697)
On the other hand, if you want to buy two of them they cost $20 + $3 S&H or $26 with free shipping.
Re:The shady economics of ‘buy one, get one free’ deals by glastra on Monday February 18, 2019 @05:26AM (#19189774)
S&H is not always fixed-rate. In fact, "handling" two items should cost more. Shipping more weight should also cost more.
Re:The shady economics of ‘buy one, get one free’ deals by elcomet on Monday February 18, 2019 @05:34AM (#19189797)
More than one shipping cost, yes, but it should be less than twice the shipping cost. Otherwise you could just order the items separately.
Re:The shady economics of ‘buy one, get one free’ deals by qrbLPHiKpiux on Monday February 18, 2019 @07:11AM (#19190134)
I bet a lot of people do not take into account of the time, fuel, wear-and-tear of their car to go get their wares.
Re:The shady economics of ‘buy one, get one free’ deals by theli0nheart on Monday February 18, 2019 @05:32AM (#19189793)
Why is this surprising? Undesirable, sure, but shipping additional things costs additional money.
Re:The shady economics of ‘buy one, get one free’ deals by zulln on Monday February 18, 2019 @05:44AM (#19189845)
Not as linear though.
Re:The shady economics of ‘buy one, get one free’ deals by newnewpdro on Monday February 18, 2019 @05:43AM (#19189840)
That greatly depends on the things.
Re:The shady economics of ‘buy one, get one free’ deals by theli0nheart on Monday February 18, 2019 @06:12AM (#19189940)
What's your point?
Re:The shady economics of ‘buy one, get one free’ deals by newnewpdro on Monday February 18, 2019 @07:34PM (#19195778)
That your generalization does not generally apply, especially in an era of extremely miniaturized popular goods.

Consolidating the S&H into the item cost makes sense for a subset of situations sure, but there's a huge set where it's exploitive.

Amazon orders for example often can amortize S&H costs by shipping a single package containing multiple items sharing a common origin. I'd argue that's true for a huge portion of Amazon orders. It's simply not a good generalization.

Re:The shady economics of ‘buy one, get one free’ deals by theli0nheart on Monday February 18, 2019 @07:56PM (#19195877)
I disagree that it's exploitative. It's simply easier. Recalculating shipping costs on a combinatatorial basis has a nonzero cost from a programming and operations POV.

Having a fixed per-item shipping costs lowers overhead drastically, especially for smaller sellers. Large sellers obviously have different customers and I doubt they get away with just multiplying PER_ITEM_SHIPPING_COST X NUMBER_OF_ITEMS (I didn't think that was the focus on the OP though).

I also disagree that it does not generally apply. Given two items, A & B, you might have the following total:

    A_shipping + A_price = A_total
    B_shipping + B_price = B_total
What you're saying is that:

    AB_shipping + A_price + B_price < A_total + B_total
But what I'm saying is that:

    A_shipping < AB_shipping
    B_shipping < AB_shipping
In other words, no matter what, shipping more items does cost more than shipping less items. So it makes sense to charge more for it. How much more is a matter of economics.
Re:The shady economics of ‘buy one, get one free’ deals by chrisan on Monday February 18, 2019 @06:22AM (#19189978)
When comparing it also makes you realize how much Amazon Prime "free shipping" is a joke sometimes since they just roll the cost into the product.

"Why am I paying for prime?"

Re:The shady economics of ‘buy one, get one free’ deals by patates on Monday February 18, 2019 @06:35AM (#19190015)
You are paying for it so you don't get charged for the shipping again. It's very, very shady.
Re:The shady economics of ‘buy one, get one free’ deals by rootusrootus on Monday February 18, 2019 @11:43AM (#19191933)
The original proposition was that Prime wasn't geting you free shipping -- that pre-dates Prime -- it was getting you upgraded to two-day service rather than the standard wait-a-week ground shipping.
Re:The shady economics of ‘buy one, get one free’ deals by rplnt on Monday February 18, 2019 @05:11AM (#19189706)
That's true. But every time you buy two mugs you subsidize the shipping for people buying just one. There are better ways to solve the "hidden shipping costs" issue than tack the price to every item.
Re:The shady economics of ‘buy one, get one free’ deals by vxNsr on Monday February 18, 2019 @07:55AM (#19190309)
Me too, as it usually indicates the store also has a generous return policy which is a must shopping online. Stores that "don't charge" for shipping are much more likely to not be stingy in other areas of the consumer experience as well.
Re:The shady economics of ‘buy one, get one free’ deals by chippy on Monday February 18, 2019 @06:04AM (#19189901)
>I actually prefer this

Yes, this is why these tactics work. The human brain is being hacked by shady practices.

Re:The shady economics of ‘buy one, get one free’ deals by rootusrootus on Monday February 18, 2019 @11:45AM (#19191949)
Or, you know, it is actually preferable for rational reasons, rather than an indicator that your brain has been hacked. You go to the store and the price you see is the price you pay (well, those of us not stuck in a sales tax state), so it's nice to be able to shop the same way online. I know the shipping is baked in, but I don't have to factor it in separately. I just shop by price.
Re:The shady economics of ‘buy one, get one free’ deals by Spivak on Monday February 18, 2019 @08:34PM (#19196032)
I don't think it's shady.

- If you return the item you will be refunded the total purchase price instead of the price of the item sans shipping.

- You know how much it will actually cost to own the item when its in your cart instead of hiding the cost until the last second when you've already committed.

Re:The shady economics of ‘buy one, get one free’ deals by adriveatrain on Monday February 18, 2019 @05:28AM (#19189782)
It does undermine the value logistics / delivery companies provide to the customers.

An industry that works on 3% margins already.