Re:Nasa’s Mars Rover Opportunity Concludes a 15-Year Mission
by jessriedel on Wednesday February 13, 2019 @06:24PM
(#19158171)
What's the limiting factor on just running with reduced staff support? (Honest question.)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Nasa’s Mars Rover Opportunity Concludes a 15-Year Mission
by Rebelgecko on Wednesday February 13, 2019 @08:28PM
(#19158901)
A small handful of people can still easily cost millions of dollars per year. And DSN time to talk to the rovers is expensive, probably in the neighborhood of $2,000 per hour.
Re:Nasa’s Mars Rover Opportunity Concludes a 15-Year Mission
by gizmo686 on Thursday February 14, 2019 @12:50AM
(#19159892)
How much DSN time do you need. Given the deley, I assume the only use is batch transfers, so cost per bit seems like the more useful metric (along with how much data is involved)
Re:Nasa’s Mars Rover Opportunity Concludes a 15-Year Mission
by jessriedel on Friday February 15, 2019 @11:19AM
(#19172083)
$5M a year seems like it would be very reasonable. The original 90-day price tag was $820M, and they've spent an additional ~$200M over the past decade and a half. Maybe it's really not worth it to spend $5M/year to extend the life further, but the scientific returns would have to be quite severely diminishing.
Re:Nasa’s Mars Rover Opportunity Concludes a 15-Year Mission
by brandonjm on Wednesday February 13, 2019 @08:07PM
(#19158797)
I had the same question, I don't imagine it takes too many people to decide what it should do and give the robot commands while monitoring it.
Re:Nasa’s Mars Rover Opportunity Concludes a 15-Year Mission
by Ianworld on Thursday February 14, 2019 @12:08AM
(#19159760)
Looks like according to an old article linked on wikipedia they spent another $100+ million over 5-6 years to keep it going. So not wildly expensive, but not cheap either.
https://web.archive.org/web/20120504171453/http://www.msnbc....