News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber’s transit offering just went live in Denver by zhoujianfu on Saturday February 02, 2019 @05:27PM (#19066184)
I assume they (and/or lyft and google maps) will eventually do what google maps should already have in my opinion, a final option next to car/walking/bike/transit/taxi: "multi-modal".

A lot of times the fastest way to get somewhere in LA is actually: walk to a scooter, scoot to the train, train to the closest stop, then uber to your final destination.

But that isn't shown automatically and it's a lot of work to calculate it yourself.

Re:Uber’s transit offering just went live in Denver by BHSPitMonkey on Saturday February 02, 2019 @05:41PM (#19066258)
Google Maps announced this back in October:

> Drive , walk and ride : support for mixed-mode commutes

> There’s a new feature for people whose commutes involve both driving and public transit. You can see helpful information about when to leave, and for each leg of your trip: you’ll know if there’s traffic on your drive, when the next train departs, and how long it’ll take to walk from the train station to the office. We do the work for you and automatically factor this into your ETA so you can anticipate exactly when you’ll get to work.

https://www.blog.google/products/maps/take-control-your-comm...

Re:Uber’s transit offering just went live in Denver by zhoujianfu on Saturday February 02, 2019 @08:03PM (#19067057)
Hmm, I just tried this but it makes you choose your mode of transit. One option is “car and public transit” but then when I tried it it had me walking 17 minutes to a bus to a train station. For a total of 81 minutes right now (when just driving would be 30). Also they’re not taking scooters into account it seems, or the ability to take an Uber from a train station..
Re:Uber’s transit offering just went live in Denver by pofilat on Saturday February 02, 2019 @07:44PM (#19066961)
Caveat: That feature only works if you pay with enhanced access to your (unrelated) data, by enabling Web and App Activity tracking/logging.
Re:Uber’s transit offering just went live in Denver by bfred_it on Saturday February 02, 2019 @11:19PM (#19067813)
I recently flushed years of Google history but I kept the tracking enabled. I’ll keep flushing it regularly and you could do the same.

I don’t really care that they track me for a short time, it’s not like they don’t keep logs anyway.

Re:Uber’s transit offering just went live in Denver by dannyw on Saturday February 02, 2019 @10:47PM (#19067719)
This is completely absurd and should be grounds for a GDPR complaint for any EU friends.

Wonder if that’s why this is US only.

Re:Uber’s transit offering just went live in Denver by kcorbitt on Saturday February 02, 2019 @05:34PM (#19066229)
I use Citymapper for this; have for years (https://citymapper.com/). It does exactly what you're asking for. I too am surprised that Google hasn't eaten their lunch by baking this into Google Maps.
Re:Uber’s transit offering just went live in Denver by zhoujianfu on Saturday February 02, 2019 @08:05PM (#19067065)
Oh, I hadn’t seen that! But hmm, it doesn’t seem to have jump bikes/scooters, Lyft scooters, bird, or lime in the scooters section, and again there’s no multi-mode.. it just shows walking/biking/Uber/public transit but not a combination of them. It does have a jet pack option which is nice and forward thinking! :)
Re:Uber’s transit offering just went live in Denver by kcorbitt on Saturday February 02, 2019 @10:07PM (#19067560)
I get multi-mode suggestions all the time, although the precise mix of options it suggests does depend on the points you're looking to travel between.

Not sure about their scooter coverage though; I don't use it for that.

Re:Uber’s transit offering just went live in Denver by andreasklinger on Saturday February 02, 2019 @10:33PM (#19067664)
citymapper has scooters/bikes and multi-mode

actually it's famous for the second one

Re:Uber’s transit offering just went live in Denver by petra on Saturday February 02, 2019 @06:05PM (#19066412)
I suspect that curating accurate transit data is a lot of boring, never ending work, and on the other hand, Google don't think they will have big enough money there(without building something like UBER, not their style), so they don't bother.
Re:Uber’s transit offering just went live in Denver by yen223 on Saturday February 02, 2019 @06:16PM (#19066495)
Google Maps already has realtime transit information for Sydney (and I suspect, any other transit system which offers Google Transit APIs).

The cool thing is that for Sydney, the same APIs are available to the public: https://opendata.transport.nsw.gov.au/dataset/public-transpo...

Re:Uber’s transit offering just went live in Denver by petra on Saturday February 02, 2019 @06:18PM (#19066505)
Sure. but compared to their competitors, they're really slow.
Re:Uber’s transit offering just went live in Denver by askvictor on Saturday February 02, 2019 @11:21PM (#19067821)
Google built an API/data standard to standardise this type of data, exactly to solve this problem.
Re:Uber’s transit offering just went live in Denver by stu_k on Saturday February 02, 2019 @05:45PM (#19066272)
Citymapper[1] will do that to a certain extent and it’s pretty good, especially with docked bikes.

I wish I could tell it I like walking more than catching a connecting bus, so I’m occasionally working on a side project to allow custom routes for common commutes.

[1] https://citymapper.com