News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Gatwick drones: Two arrested over flight disruption by andrewnicolalde on Saturday December 22, 2018 @04:23AM (#18739788)
What about all of the other legitimate users of GPS?
Re:Gatwick drones: Two arrested over flight disruption by kortilla on Saturday December 22, 2018 @04:24AM (#18739793)
They suffer a minor inconvenience as precision is lost. The US military frequently does selective jamming near bases and other ‘special’ areas.
Re:Gatwick drones: Two arrested over flight disruption by tomalpha on Saturday December 22, 2018 @04:35AM (#18739840)
The tricky bit here is that this is a civilian airport. Jamming GPS could reasonably be expected to cause significant difficulties for civilian planes and pilots. And thus passengers.
Re:Gatwick drones: Two arrested over flight disruption by grogenaut on Saturday December 22, 2018 @04:46AM (#18739880)
The airport was already disrupted because of the drones, disrupted to the point of shut down. thus the article.
Re:Gatwick drones: Two arrested over flight disruption by amaccuish on Saturday December 22, 2018 @06:14AM (#18740100)
As has been mentioned earlier, there are 5 airports in London.
Re:Gatwick drones: Two arrested over flight disruption by JimDabell on Saturday December 22, 2018 @06:42AM (#18740168)
There aren't five airports in London. There are quite a few airports with "London" in the name, but they aren't particularly close to London. London Luton Airport, for instance, is ~45km north of London, and London Gatwick is ~50km south of London. There's ~100km distance between Luton and the airport that was affected by the drones.
Re:Gatwick drones: Two arrested over flight disruption by simonh on Saturday December 22, 2018 @09:11AM (#18740628)
How do you think those planes get to those airports? There are planes flying all over the south east going to if from numerous airports. Then there’s the impact on GPS in cars, trucks, phones, police vehicles, ambulances, all sorts of emergency services. We’d have to be extremely careful about potential impact before considering such a drastic step that has a very small chance of actually being effective.
Re:Gatwick drones: Two arrested over flight disruption by JimDabell on Saturday December 22, 2018 @10:01AM (#18740833)
I think you might have misread my comment. What I said was that there aren't five airports in London. You seem to have understood that to mean something very different.
Re:Gatwick drones: Two arrested over flight disruption by cedivad on Saturday December 22, 2018 @05:02AM (#18739929)
Not really, whatever you are jamming you can just make sure it doesn't make it 10 km up in the air where most of the planes are (especially given the GPS patch antenna pointing up from the plane), and I don't believe they need GPS signal on takeoff/landing, they use older tech for that.
Re:Gatwick drones: Two arrested over flight disruption by sergiosgc on Saturday December 22, 2018 @07:14AM (#18740253)
> (...) I don't believe they need GPS signal on takeoff/landing, they use older tech for that.

Much older. The basic "stack" uses radio beacons, not greatly different from early XX century tech. The more advanced Instrument Landing System is quite a bit more complex, but in very basic terms is a set of radio beacons that define a glide path. It is local, and requires no GPS.

Re:Gatwick drones: Two arrested over flight disruption by cm2187 on Saturday December 22, 2018 @05:47AM (#18740030)
10km up? What about all the planes landing at the other airports of London?
Re:Gatwick drones: Two arrested over flight disruption by codeduck on Saturday December 22, 2018 @07:16AM (#18740260)
Most of which are geographically distant enough to not be affected by localised jamming.

Never mind that Aircraft will be under ATC in UK airspace, and ATC uses Radar + transponder to localise aircraft.

GPS is a navigational aid, not the primary navigation tool.

Re:Gatwick drones: Two arrested over flight disruption by simon_acca on Saturday December 22, 2018 @04:53AM (#18739908)
All flights were grounded anyway