Re:Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jump...
by joker3 on Thursday December 13, 2018 @08:36PM
(#18677712)
It's also essential to read the first cited article (https://www.bmj.com/content/327/7429/1459?ijkey=3b8c1a70a8d2...) which very much inspired this paper and is also quite a bit funnier.
Re:Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jump...
by marcosdumay on Thursday December 13, 2018 @09:25PM
(#18677943)
$37 for 1 day access to download the paper. If that's not part of the satire, I don't know what it is.
Re:Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jump...
by nkurz on Thursday December 13, 2018 @09:39PM
(#18678011)
That might be the suggested amount, and it is a great paper, but I think you are allowed to donate less if you choose: http://sci-hub.tw/10.1136/bmj.327.7429.1459
Re:Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jump...
by superkuh on Friday December 14, 2018 @09:52AM
(#18681162)
Thankfully at least bmj still has a real website. Most of the elsevier journals have moved on to a 'web app' design for journal articles and IEEEXplore has as well. These load and display absolutely no article information until you successfully run all of their third party code (only works in latest Chrome and FF). That means you can't even get the DOI from the page for sci-hub. All you get is the crappy little 'loading' spinners.
Re:Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jump...
by asdofindia on Tuesday December 25, 2018 @01:41PM
(#18758643)
You will benefit from http://unpaywall.org/
Re:Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jump...
by byset on Thursday December 13, 2018 @09:18PM
(#18677914)
It's like when someone says something funny, then another person follows up with a witticism that basically repeats the same joke...
Like someone makes an inspired pun and some dude immediately exclaims "LITERALLY!"
Re:Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jump...
by codeulike on Friday December 14, 2018 @04:03AM
(#18679465)
The point being made by this new paper is actually substantially different to the original 2003 one
Re:Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jump...
by ikeboy on Thursday December 13, 2018 @09:42PM
(#18678020)
They did an actual trial here though
Re:Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jump...
by excalibur on Thursday December 13, 2018 @11:24PM
(#18678460)
Also, the one with the trial was just published, while the funny one is from 2003. Maybe this is immediate in sea turtle years?
Re:Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jump...
by simonh on Friday December 14, 2018 @07:43AM
(#18680404)
>We think that everyone might benefit if the most radical protagonists of evidence based medicine organised and participated in a double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, crossover trial of the parachute.
Classic.
Re:Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jump...
by conistonwater on Friday December 14, 2018 @06:22AM
(#18680058)
> The relevance to parachute use is that individuals jumping from aircraft
without the help of a parachute are likely to have a
high prevalence of pre-existing psychiatric morbidity.
Individuals who use parachutes are likely to have less
psychiatric morbidity and may also differ in key demographic
factors, such as income and cigarette use. It
follows, therefore, that the apparent protective effect of
parachutes may be merely an example of the “healthy
cohort” effect.
> We conducted the PARACHUTE trial to illustrate the perils of interpreting trials outside of context. When strong beliefs about the standard of care exist in the community, often only low risk patients are enrolled in a trial, which can unsalvageably bias the results, akin to jumping from an aircraft without a parachute. Assuming that the findings of such a trial are generalisable to the broader population may produce disastrous consequences.
>Before you jump to the conclusion that we’re suggesting we jettison RCTs from clinical research, let us clarify that that is not our intention. In an ideal world, new interventions would always be carefully evaluated through rigorous RCTs before widespread adoption. But when pre-existing convictions about an untested intervention affect the population enrolled, even a well conducted RCT can provide misleading results. Without careful attention to context, extrapolating findings from such an RCT to the patient in front of us may be, well, a leap too far.