Re:Chinese Tokamak reaches over 100M degrees
by mcv on Wednesday November 14, 2018 @07:13AM
(#18449271)
It's also wrong. Kelvin is not in degrees. It's just 100M Kelvin.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Chinese Tokamak reaches over 100M degrees
by antx on Wednesday November 14, 2018 @08:17AM
(#18449596)
You're right, the degree was removed in 1967, because Kelvin's units are considered absolute. However, one could argue that, since it has a scale, each "step" or "unit" can be considered a "degree", like in a literal scale. In informal conversation, we should not be so pedantic. Even some modern scientific textbooks still include the degree.
Re:Chinese Tokamak reaches over 100M degrees
by mcv on Wednesday November 14, 2018 @09:23AM
(#18449980)
> the degree was removed in 1967
I did not know that. I've always thought it was originally defined as units Kelvin, without degree.
Re:Chinese Tokamak reaches over 100M degrees
by monochromatic on Wednesday November 14, 2018 @08:24AM
(#18449640)
Indeed. Nobody’s going to be confused by “degrees Kelvin.”
Re:Chinese Tokamak reaches over 100M degrees
by jasonincanada on Wednesday November 14, 2018 @09:21AM
(#18449968)
Technically 100M kelvins
Re:Chinese Tokamak reaches over 100M degrees
by tantalor on Wednesday November 14, 2018 @11:16AM
(#18450966)
100 megakelvins (MK)
Re:Chinese Tokamak reaches over 100M degrees
by Skunkleton on Wednesday November 14, 2018 @02:01PM
(#18452750)
Who is Kelvin and why are there so many of him?