Just to be clear: the issue isn't that you don't like SF or whatever, it's that an idée fixe becomes a broken record and drags down discussion quality.
> You've posted tons of comments grinding this axe, and it has passed the point of tedium, so please stop.
Your asking me to filter or silence my voice and displeasure of the dirty underbelly of the bay area and its omnipresent hypocrisy. My main complaint is that both sides of arguments are not free to discuss on HN, and it seems that more traditional and conservative ideologies are shutdown, moderated, and displaced, while extreme liberal ideas are celebrated. We all have our inherent biases and leanings, but as HN moderators it seems unfair to selectively target moderates or conservatives.
You clearly haven't dealt with the cost of the bay area before. Your dollar's purchasing power is cut in half compared to the Midwest.
Housing is what makes the coasts costly. Other expenses are roughly similar and more than compensated for by higher earnings. Sometimes they can even be lower, like health insurance or certain goods or services. Because housing is so variable it's difficult to say which is more affordable without specifics, but the higher your disposable income the more likely it is that working in a coastal city makes more sense. If we both can save 20% each year for retirement or kids' college tuition, my 20% will be much larger than your 20% given the often times huge disparity in absolute earnings, and even my 10% or 5% might be more than your 20%. The price of a condo in Florida or Arizona is the same for both of us. State college tuition is also much more similar across states relative to earnings differentials.
Most people rationalize their decisions to stay put or somewhere familiar. If they didn't, most retirees would have moved to Ecuador--social security and pension payments are the same no matter where you live.
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/sanfranciscocou...