Ok, I'll bite.

...will connect the BitTorrent peer-to-peer network and the TRON blockchain network => BitTorrent will start accepting "coins"

a custom token => a new "coin"

an in-client token economy => the "coin" will only be valid for downloading torrents

to address existing limitations => too many leechers, not enough seeders

and open a new borderless economy => will be valid across nation-state boundaries

for exchanging value for computer resources => bandwidth and storage

Translation:

BitTorrent will start accepting a new type of "coin" that will only be valid within the BitTorrent network to allow leechers to pay seeders to download files.

Do the seeders generate the coins specific to each torrent, or is this some sort of scam where coins are made by TRON and users now have to pay for what's already free..?

I have no clue! That said, from the website:

> Users can earn tokens for continuing to seed files after a download is complete

> Users who participate will exchange tokens with each other on the basis of resources provided, not mining

Seems like you get paid when you seed, and you can use what you earned to download other stuff. How's the initial money generated? No idea. Maybe you've to buy the tokens for real $$$ or bitcoins or something. Or maybe you can choose to host a file and gather tokens.

You mean proactive award winning innovative solutions leveraging state of the art leading technologies don't engage with industry standard customer expectations on value proposition, or what?

I paradigmed in my pants.

What you said also doesn't mean anything.

This specific line is not a good example of meaningless words. It makes intelligible comprehensible sense and describes the project well. What problem do you have with it?

"Project Atlas will connect the BitTorrent peer-to-peer network [the existing network, utilizing the existing BitTorrent protocol] and the TRON blockchain network [TRON blockchain exists, it's a separate project, look it up] via a set of bittorrent protocol extensions, a custom token [not the TRON token itself, but a sub-token used for the purposes of project Atlas specifically], and an in-client [the functionality will be built-in into the BitTorrent client, the users will not have to use any extra software or web platform] token economy [economic system where tokens are used as means of transfer of value] to address existing limitations [rare torrents becoming hard to find seeds for, fakes, etc..] and open a new borderless [global, not contained within a single country or economic region of the world, users from any countries will be able to participate] economy for exchanging value [Atlas tokens, maybe other cryptos through exchanges] for computer resources [storage space and bandwidth used to store and distribute a torrent file] on a global scale."

"There is a problem with torrents - nobody want to seed. Let's create new coin - using TRON blockchain - to reward seeders automatically" would be the same, but with no bullshit.

"There is a problem with torrents - nobody want to seed. So let's require users to pay us money for our penny stock tokens"

Making it a better sentence is possible, making the system itself exist in the real world much less so. You can't make systems like this as described due to the reality that all decentralized systems face; the sybil problem, and by extension all the problems that occur when people try to solve that with a web of trust.

Why does it work in Bitcoin and other PoW blockchains?

It didn't work; that's why Bitcoin has steadily become more centralized until it became non-decentralized enough to be practical.

So are we arguing semantics now and the exact definition of the word "decentralized"? Well alright, let's agree about this for the sake of argument.

What stops this proposed project from working in the same "decentralized" way that Bitcoin and other PoW schemes are "decentralized" right now, and are working practically? Why wouldn't it work in torrents?

Now you know how the average person feels when reading something nerdy.

Just say they twisted some magic streams and marshmallow-man happend.

Yes and no. I think even an average Joe or Jane will quickly notice that "nerdy words" usually have pretty specific (if complex) meanings, whereas this... this is just mostly line noise.

You can learn the nerdy things and understand what you're reading. No amount of learning will lead you to understanding bullshit like this.

Wait. Howcome I understood every word of that, got the meaning and even the author's intention?

Explain what it means then, without using any blockchain buzzwords (decentralized, web of trust, proof of work etc.)

"Gee, wouldn't it be nice if leechers could pay seeders instead of just leeching? There's a lot of hype right now about a tech that's supposedly good for building various kinds of Magic Internet Money; maybe we could integrate some form of that."

("decentralized" at least actually means something here - BitTorrent is already a decentralized protocol, there are no central BitTorrent servers that coordinate things. So anything that would be properly integrated with BitTorrent would have to be decentralized somehow.)

by paying exorbitant amounts for bullshit.

The video[1] does sliglty a lot better job of explaining what's going on.

[1] - https://youtu.be/n_BA8tUlRLA?t=63