Re:GNU nano 3.0 released
by h1d on Sunday September 09, 2018 @12:07PM
(#17946496)
What are the alternatives to nano? (Just out of curiosity)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
I like ne
Re:GNU nano 3.0 released
by LeoPanthera on Sunday September 09, 2018 @01:26PM
(#17946858)
mc (midnight commander) has a built in editor that is actually pretty great. "mcedit" if you have mc installed.
Re:GNU nano 3.0 released
by therealmarv on Monday September 10, 2018 @09:02AM
(#17951471)
That's a nice alternative. Never thought of that. On most machines I have mc already installed so it's a real package installable alternative (unlike micro).
This is a pretty open ended question. Alternatives include everything from vi/vim, ed, emacs, to pico (and probably some I have forgotten..)
Vim and emacs are huge, powerful texteditors that aren't competing with nano. Ed is...unusable in 2018. So just pico.
(ed was unusable in 1988)
:-)
If you would read between lines (of a single line), I meant those ones that aren't vim or emacs related clones.
Re:GNU nano 3.0 released
by forgotpwd16 on Sunday September 09, 2018 @05:27PM
(#17947871)
Alternatives as in "easy-to-use no-hassles console editor"? JOE brings more features and it even comes with a nano (actually pico) mode accessible with the jpico command. Ne comes with macros and it uses standard keybindings (C-s,c,v,z...). Both predate nano and are the repos of most distros.
vim?
Hallelujah
micro
Question could be considered flamebait. Ahhh, the good times... editor wars on usenet.
I use zile.
Re:GNU nano 3.0 released
by forgotpwd16 on Sunday September 09, 2018 @05:06PM
(#17947795)
I like Zile but it lacks Unicode support.