Re:Facebook Wanted Gizmodo to Kill Investigative Tool
by orbitingpluto on Tuesday August 07, 2018 @01:29PM
(#17708643)
... and which they are supposed to provide upon request.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Facebook Wanted Gizmodo to Kill Investigative Tool
by swsieber on Tuesday August 07, 2018 @01:36PM
(#17708711)
... to individual users. And individually, your data isn't worth much. It's the aggregate that surfaces the really interesting things.
Re:Facebook Wanted Gizmodo to Kill Investigative Tool
by __jal on Tuesday August 07, 2018 @01:45PM
(#17708792)
> ... to individual users.
... Which is what this tool does.
And while I take your point about aggregate value, I personally have a great deal of interest in data about me.
Re:Facebook Wanted Gizmodo to Kill Investigative Tool
by rfinney on Tuesday August 07, 2018 @01:44PM
(#17708778)
Wouldn't it be interesting to a finance firm, insurance company or potential employer?
Re:Facebook Wanted Gizmodo to Kill Investigative Tool
by jgalt212 on Tuesday August 07, 2018 @02:53PM
(#17709455)
Yes, depending on the size of the loan a borrower would pay good money for such data on a single user.
That being said, a less nefarious use could be lender has a std mortgage rate of 4.25%, but if you give us a FB data dump, you can quality for a 4.00% rate.
Re:Facebook Wanted Gizmodo to Kill Investigative Tool
by baud147258 on Wednesday August 08, 2018 @04:46AM
(#17714141)
> That being said, a less nefarious use could be lender has a std mortgage rate of 4.25%, but if you give us a FB data dump, you can quality for a 4.00% rate.
Or, with your FB, the bank realize you have an higher risk of defaulting/dying before paying the full mortgage, so they bump the rate to 5%