Real question
Philosophically it's a rather fun question, but practically they'll probably just honor it until the corresponding date of the new era.
See https://www.gov.uk/weights-measures-and-packaging-the-law
30s: Wear a heavy coat
40s: Wear a light coat
50s: Wear a jacket
60s: Wear a hoodie
70s: Wear a t-shirt
80s: Wear shorts
-ve Don't go outside
0s Wear a coat
10s Wear a jacket
20s Wear a t-shirt
30s Don't go outside
-30s cold
-20s February
-10s beanie optional
-0s can't store non-alcoholic drinks on the balcony
+0s wear waterproof boots
+10s no need to wear a jacket
+20s don't wear more than a t-shirt
+30s can't sleep since my apt. has no AC
Fixed that for northeners you insensitive clod.
I'm in the US and although I spent some time in Canada I am for the most part not used to seeing the metric system used day to day. My metric system knowledge basically is what I remember from elementary and middle school.
a lot of construction related things that are priced by the cubic volume are still in cubic yards.
I suppose they like using lbs and sqft as $/lb is smaller and sqft is a bigger number than sqm (and of course the inertia which I prefer calling "being lazy")
It is definitely ridiculous
Of course you are right that no sane person would contemplate this calendar for any purpose other than user-facing display, and even then only where it is absolutely required.
But the insane WTF thing is that it does still seem to be widely required on any kind of financial document. Expense reports, salary statements, that kind of thing. All my banks use this format (and also SJIS text encoding when I download my data (T_T)...)
There are also lots of internal processes^W^W Excel spreadsheets in active use that expect these values so I've seen more than one program that converts 2013 to "H.25"... and it's literally impossible to represent a future date, since we don't know when the emperor might die, even if we have a projected abdication date.
I can't be too smug about it, since I'm American (miles and feet, anybody?) but it is... objectively non-optimal.