Our experience launching a paid, proprietary product on Linux

Re:Our experience launching a paid, proprietary product on L... by ndarwincorn on Monday July 23, 2018 @04:12PM (#17595575)

>there is no Linux outlook

With the GH aquisition I'll be shocked if we don't see most of MS's desktop stuff, including Office, move to Electron/WebAssembly in the next few years.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Our experience launching a paid, proprietary product on L... by awill on Monday July 23, 2018 @05:28PM (#17596181)

Outlook is already a bloated beast. Moving it to Electron would be a disaster. I can't see it happening. Maybe a 'lite' version of outlook, but not the version enterprises use.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Our experience launching a paid, proprietary product on L... by hug on Monday July 23, 2018 @09:15PM (#17597401)

Yes, but https://twitter.com/thelarkinn/status/1006746626617008128?s=...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Our experience launching a paid, proprietary product on L... by pjmlp on Tuesday July 24, 2018 @12:56AM (#17598210)

That guy was forced to comment on Reddit that he was joking about it.

What about linking to that instead?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Our experience launching a paid, proprietary product on L... by fourthark on Tuesday July 24, 2018 @01:31AM (#17598347)

https://amp.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/8qqhlz/office_...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Our experience launching a paid, proprietary product on L... by sah2ed on Tuesday July 24, 2018 @04:18AM (#17599053)

From the same author, but longer:

https://twitter.com/TheLarkInn/status/1006907969760473093/ph...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Our experience launching a paid, proprietary product on L... by freeone3000 on Tuesday July 24, 2018 @02:47PM (#17603856)

Don't worry, by then we'll have more ram and faster processors and it'll run nearly as quick!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Our experience launching a paid, proprietary product on L... by GenericsMotors on Tuesday July 24, 2018 @02:59AM (#17598696)

Then prepare to be shocked

[ Parent | on HN ]