Re:CS230: Deep Learning – Project Reports and Posters, Sprin...
by glup on Thursday June 21, 2018 @12:47PM
(#17366817)
Adobe InDesign or Illustrator at the high end, Powerpoint, Pages, or Google Slides at the low end. I've found Illustrator the best compromise between power and simplicity (provided you have a license).
Re:CS230: Deep Learning – Project Reports and Posters, Sprin...
by ska on Thursday June 21, 2018 @02:04PM
(#17367710)
Likewise. And it's the only way to get decent typesetting on complex equations for one - though it might be a mistake to include those on many posters.
Re:CS230: Deep Learning – Project Reports and Posters, Sprin...
by happymandrake on Friday June 22, 2018 @12:30AM
(#17371310)
In my lab most of the poster templates were already fairly standard and available on a shared drive. Also anecdotally, I stopped sending my professor LaTeX documents as soon as she said she didn't know how to open them/wouldn't be bothered. It was a point of pride for some professors to use LaTeX, but we generally used word for the edit tracking feature to publish efficiently.
Re:CS230: Deep Learning – Project Reports and Posters, Sprin...
by lao_zhuang on Thursday June 21, 2018 @11:41AM
(#17366147)
Except for one weekly in-person lecture (and the project-related material) cs230 consisted of deep learning.ai Coursera modules, so videos and code are on coursera.
Re:CS230: Deep Learning – Project Reports and Posters, Sprin...
by J0-nas on Thursday June 21, 2018 @07:27PM
(#17370047)
How advanced are those student in their studies when they take this course?
Their work is probably good but I can't help but think many of the reports/posters seem underwhelming. I doubt they would be accepted at the universities I know.
http://cs230.stanford.edu/projects_spring_2018/posters/82658...
http://cs230.stanford.edu/projects_spring_2018/posters/82857...
http://cs230.stanford.edu/projects_spring_2018/posters/82845...
[0] https://www.dropbox.com/s/xubgkxbdgpe0i3r/icwsm_poster_a1.pd...
I would really advise against using Latex for posters.
Their work is probably good but I can't help but think many of the reports/posters seem underwhelming. I doubt they would be accepted at the universities I know.