czr
$79 for airpods max battery service [0]. user-replaceable battery certainly would be nicer. but to describe as "throw-away" seems extreme.
[0] https://support.apple.com/airpods/repair/service#battery
video 1 (response measurement): https://aip.scitation.org/doi/suppl/10.1063/1.5129958/suppl_...
video 2 (picking up block): https://aip.scitation.org/doi/suppl/10.1063/1.5129958/suppl_...
video 3 (hexapod): https://aip.scitation.org/doi/suppl/10.1063/1.5129958/suppl_...
video 4 (human climbing tiled wall): https://aip.scitation.org/doi/suppl/10.1063/1.5129958/suppl_...
video 5 (human climbing concrete wall): https://aip.scitation.org/doi/suppl/10.1063/1.5129958/suppl_...
Array.from(document.styleSheets).forEach(ss => Array.from(ss.rules).forEach((ssr,i) => {if (ssr.cssText && ssr.cssText.includes("dark")) {ssr.parentStyleSheet.deleteRule(i)}}))[0] http://www.autonocast.com/blog/2018/7/13/91-hotz-takes-with-... [1] https://youtu.be/iwcYp-XT7UI?t=1605
also, when presenting results, prefer to include a longer demo or sub-demos that show strengths and failure cases, and move to the top of the post rather than bottom imo. for a given reader, implementation details are either confusing and uninteresting (if not subject-matter expert) or predictable and uninteresting (if an expert, you've seen many similar before); audience for implementation details is very small number of people who want to sit down and replicate or check your work. but demos / analysis is always novel and interesting to anyone, so lead with that :)
[0] https://medium.com/@chengyao.shen/decoding-comma-ai-openpilo...
for those interested in kuronet [1] and the competition alex gave a presentation here (en, [2]) as did tarin (ja, [3]).
for those interested in classical japanese literature, you can see the tools they've built here [4]. tarin is also very active on twitter [5].
[0] https://www.kaggle.com/c/kuzushiji-recognition/discussion
[1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.09433.pdf
[2] https://youtu.be/e2-mVBvygm8?t=1428
[3] https://youtu.be/e2-mVBvygm8?t=537
methodology is a separate u-net per instrument type to predict a soft mask in spectrogram space (time x frequency), then they apply that mask to the input audio. fairly standard.
example:
https://files.catbox.moe/wjruiv.mp3 (phonicmind)
https://files.catbox.moe/uuzot3.mp3 (spleeter 2stem)
you can hear spleeter does better at actually taking out the bass drums, but phonicmind never loses or distorts any part of the vocal, while 2stem occasionally sounds like singing is through metal tube (harmonics are missing). will try to read instructions more carefully and see if there's some way to fix.
> It is only by harsh experience that we learn which principles take priority over which other principles; as mere words they all sound equally persuasive.
18% of men, 12% of women; 18/30 is... 60%? huh?
Ask HN: What happened to Google's programming-related search results?
Historically, Googling tech questions would yield a link to the appropriate section of the official documentation, relevant posts from Stack* or personal tech blogs, and maybe a wikipedia/c2 article.However, as of late (~past 6 months), 30-50% of the results are w3schools-esque sites like "tutorialspoint.com", "thegeekdiary.com", "cyberciti.biz", "geeksforgeeks.org", "thegeekstuff.com",...
but for the stated purpose this looks pretty good. for example, 720p [https://giant.gfycat.com/AccomplishedBelatedBlueshark.webm] to 1440p [https://giant.gfycat.com/FluidBlissfulCob.webm] test. is subtle, improves video, and runs fine (tested via mpv, https://mpv.io/manual/master/#options-glsl-shaders).