also, believe me when i tell you that for SF at least, scooters are the least of your aesthetic concerns on the streets and sidewalks...
http://nordic.businessinsider.com/contentassets/15ba9de498c2...
Cars have all the problems you’ve mentioned and more and I’m also dissatisfied with how much public space we’ve set aside for them, but they also mostly stay off sidewalks and wait at street crossings, so at least we’ve also set aside space for pedestrians to get from one place to another that is usable even for those in wheelchairs.
This is a snarky but accurate restatement of your (commonly professed) belief.
i do agree having regs to dissuade people from blocking & riding on the sidewalk with scooters seems very reasonable.
once you have that i think scooters are basically problem free (except for maybe aesthetic concerns).
even w/o that, i still don't see how anyone reasonable could think scooters were anywhere near the top of the list of hazards of sf streets.
(perhaps they are a major inconvenience for wheelchair users?; i'd be interested in any first-hand accounts.)
If I have to do that with a bike or scooter even once! in those months you mention it takes to pay itself off, then it's not worth it.
I don't want to have to carry my scooter into a crowded Illy just to meet someone for coffee.
They are not that light, but still vastly more portable than a bike and you don't need to worry about them being stolen from the street.
I live in a smallish apartment in NYC and don't have room for a bike so city bike makes sense but I could see myself buying one of these and keeping it in the closet.
Of course the author was just visiting SF and only needed it temporarily - in that case I understand the need for a rental option, but you should be able to rent it for a whole week for little cost.
I am an owner of an electric scooter myself, but I do not enjoy the shared scooters lying around everywhere on the streets like trash. It is understandable to me why the numbers would be limited by the city.