> creating and distributing low-quality clickbait content profitable, pushing more serious content aside.

Sure, you can make that argument, but why should anyone decide what kind of content is worthwhile?

Are you suggesting a "internet content quality board"?

Let users decide what content is worthwhile, voting with their clicks, eyes and wallets.

I don't see any need for any quality control.

You're saying that you don't like the content, so you'd be ok with it going away.

What about people who like it and use the services?

Nobody is forcing you to consume ad-sponsored content.

Apple appear to be giving us, the users, some ways to claim our privacy back. I really don't see a problem here. Want content that relies on tracking for revenue? Use software that supports the tracking. Don't want it? Use software that doesn't support it.

Then don't use those services. The choice is yours. Let other users assess the value for themselves.

This also doesn’t work given the masses have zero idea of the tracking that is happening and blindly trust Zuck’s lies on how Facebook respects their privacy. If people knew the extent of the tracking you’d see a lot more backlash.

And since when should you have a "choice of products"?

Companies offer products, if you like them, use them.

I don't have a choice of free cars.

You may not have the choice or free cars, but you have a choice of plenty of paid cars, including ones that don’t stalk you everywhere you go.

I don’t have a choice between a free Facebook and a paid Facebook that doesn’t stalk me. I have to either take the free Facebook and be stalked.... or not take the free Facebook and still get stalked by their like buttons everywhere.

Remember, you're the one accessing. The choice is yours.