News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Michael Pollan reluctantly embraces the 'new science' of ... by heracles on Thursday May 17, 2018 @02:40AM (#17089295)
Can't you see it as a indication of the opposite of what we typically call God? That instead of there being an external entity outside our universe interacting with you, you talked to something God-like inside yourself. This might be what you share with every person in history that ever have received divine inspiration. That same experience motivated them. Just like we can share experience with other people when we are happy, tired of drunk. But this one requires a more complicated key to access, which could be elaborate practices or a drug.

I might be wrong, but I find these psilocybin experiments extremely enlightening as to why we as humans struggle so much with religious experience.

Did my suggestion make sense? I tried to word it as plainly as possible, but these are things we aren't used to discuss...

Re:Michael Pollan reluctantly embraces the 'new science' of ... by ianai on Thursday May 17, 2018 @03:12AM (#17089407)
I understood you. It’s a neat concept.
Re:Michael Pollan reluctantly embraces the 'new science' of ... by bfuller on Thursday May 17, 2018 @03:19AM (#17089436)
This person was unwilling or unable to assimilate their experience and now they are blaming LSD.

Funny enough, if he kept taking LSD and exploring his spirituality he could deal with the feelings of believing in science but being shaken by the possibility of the supernatural. That's actually pretty straightforward.

But he is choosing to close the book on it, and now is blaming the drug when really its himself. An act of ego if I've ever seen one.

Re:Michael Pollan reluctantly embraces the 'new science' of ... by dang on Thursday May 17, 2018 @12:28PM (#17092797)
Can you please not take HN threads further into flamewar and personal attack? That's the wrong way down a one-way street.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re:Michael Pollan reluctantly embraces the 'new science' of ... by tigershark on Thursday May 17, 2018 @07:33AM (#17090417)
It’s bewildering how many drug defendants are here on HN. For you the solution is not to avoid assuming dangerous drugs that can mess badly your mind, as happened to the gp, but on the contrary is continuing to assume it once your mind is messed up. Maybe if one day the same things happen to you you may change your point of view, although it would be too late at that point I fear.
Re:Michael Pollan reluctantly embraces the 'new science' of ... by saiya-jin on Thursday May 17, 2018 @08:04AM (#17090569)
Psychedelics are by far the strongest and most life-and-mind altering thing you can experience in your life, it changed my life for better. It comes with very fat disclaimers and blinking warning signs, and for very good reason.

You can't get similar experience anywhere else apart from years and years of mediation training, I'll believe when I hear somebody who experienced both and compared favorably. So far 0 persons. Look at what people are willing to do to get to Everest for example, and even reaching the top during multi-month expedition won't get you such a powerful experience (didn't do exactly that, but smaller similar stuff - very nice, but 'meh' compared to this).

Sure, I'll keep defending it, against prevalent ignorance and stupidity in the population. It was one of the best things that happened to me in my life (didn't have any for last 10 years maybe, the experience is still part of me and always will be).

Re:Michael Pollan reluctantly embraces the 'new science' of ... by bfuller on Thursday May 17, 2018 @07:53AM (#17090521)
LSD didn't mess up his mind. It made him feel conflicted about ideas that are in his head. He literally started the post saying he was sane and doesnt suffer from depression or any other mental illness. psychedelics are safe for those people.

That is ENTIRELY different from being predisposed to psychosis, which psychedelics can bring out.

And your logic can be reversed. Lives have been saved from giving extremely depressed people microdoses of LSD. But people like you would rather throw those people to the wayside and tell them they can't take the drug that works for them because you have some kind of personal agenda.

Re:Michael Pollan reluctantly embraces the 'new science' of ... by pwm on Thursday May 17, 2018 @06:07AM (#17090063)
While I agree, please realise that your approach is really not helpful! We don't tell someone who just fell off the bike and afraid of sitting back that "if you've just sat back you'd now be riding, hair in the wind". This only alienates people.
Re:Michael Pollan reluctantly embraces the 'new science' of ... by bfuller on Thursday May 17, 2018 @07:56AM (#17090531)
Yeah well he alienated a bunch of people by misleading people saying it was LSD that caused his hallucinations when really it was Nitrous.
Re:Michael Pollan reluctantly embraces the 'new science' of ... by enkephalin on Thursday May 17, 2018 @04:40AM (#17089757)
my first thought was about the same; "shouldn't have stopped there".

and really, their experience fundamentally sounds like a good thing. a new way of looking at, or experiencing the world was opened to them. yeah, it can be frightening, and that's why you need to put more work in, to accommodate it in your life.

Re:Michael Pollan reluctantly embraces the 'new science' of ... by collyw on Thursday May 17, 2018 @04:20AM (#17089679)
I was thinking something similar.
Re:Michael Pollan reluctantly embraces the 'new science' of ... by akvadrako on Thursday May 17, 2018 @08:11AM (#17090618)
And that inner God likely lives in the right side of your brain:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicameralism_(psychology)

Re:Michael Pollan reluctantly embraces the 'new science' of ... by neaden on Thursday May 17, 2018 @10:38AM (#17091610)
If by likely you mean according to a discredited theory proposed by one person and based on some really bad historical understanding.