News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by seiferteric on Thursday March 29, 2018 @04:45PM (#16710874)
> Building a gaming PC in real life is way too hard

Huh?

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by badlucklottery on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:24PM (#16711168)
I think it's one of those things that's super easy when everything goes right and requiring some pretty arcane tricks when they go wrong.

I just recently put together a new PC and I was getting close to done. I plugged everything in before putting the side panels on, hit the power button and...nothing. No fans, no beeps, nada.

Okay, I'll just disconnect the ATX power cable from the motherboard and short PS_ON to ground and see if the PSU fan will spin a bit...nothing again.

Hmm. Maybe the modular cable is bad? Google the pinout for Corsair's "Type 4" PSU to make sure it's what I assume it is, drop my bit of wire down the correct pins directly on the PSU, jam my multimeter probes down a 12v + ground and...hell yeah, getting 11.something volts.

Okay, bad ATX power cable, call Corsair, wait a week, problem solved. My wife was watching me do all this on the breakfast bar and kept asking "how did you know to try that?" and I really didn't have a good answer other than "been doing this or watching my dad do this since I was 8".

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by jerf on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:27PM (#16711200)
I'm not sure I've ever assembled a computer without 1. exhaustively searching the internet about all the components and their interactions, finding no red flags 2. buying and assembling all the components 3. discovering some critical problem that requires some arcane setting to fix that probably downgrades performance 4. searching the internet for this particular problem and getting dozens of hits now that I have a specific symptom to go with my hardware.

Clearly step 1 is going wrong somehow, but, I mean, I'm a fairly typical HN poster, you know, I've got at least intermediate-level search skills, you know?

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by ansible on Thursday March 29, 2018 @06:41PM (#16711831)
Certainly there are things that can easily trip up an occasional PC builder.

One of the things I always do these days is look up the memory compatibility for the motherboard I've selected, and then only buy off of that list. There are so many variations in just DDR4 2400 memory, and matching up all the parameters (timing, latency, etc.) is a hassle.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by Kagerjay on Thursday March 29, 2018 @06:34PM (#16711752)
Had my PC for about 15 years built from scratch. Over the years I've gutted and added new parts to the point that I have no original components anymore.

Theres two things I hate dealing with the most when it comes to PC building. Those are (1) building a PC from scratch from all new components (2) debugging a PC when a part died

This is because diagnosing the problem and identifying what was wrong could be so many possible things. Back then as well we also didnt have these nice tools like pcpartpicker.com, all of these great youtube tutorials, just a bunch of forums to debug issues.

PC not turning on? Maybe the power supply is not working. Or maybe its the power button itself is having a problem, the switch might have disconnected. Or maybe the wall power outlet is having issues, and maybe can't handle the load. Maybe you changed out a part recently and didnt connect the pins correctly, or during transportation something disconnected. Have to manually check every wire. Are the fans spinning at least?

Is the OS not booting? Okay, is BIOs at least running? Before that, can you hook up a keyboard into the PC? Is that even registering? Does it need an adapter (older PCs didnt use USB 2.0 ports for keyboard mouse). Do you have compatibility issues with hardware components?

Is the computer registering the RAM? Did you check if you slotted it in correctly, by shoving the pins far enough in and latching it? Its possiblethe RAM you recieved was dead on arrival. Try swapping the outlets and see if anything registers

When you changed the CPU did you make sure you didnt bend any pins? If you did your SOL. Maybe you put too much thermal compound between the fan and CPU.

Between all of these steps, did you make sure to ground yourself and prevent static charge from frying your motherboard?

Is your OS booting but your having software issues? Run safemode and find the culprit.

The list goes on and on and it just never ends. Narrowing down the specific issue was always a PITA.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by erik_seaberg on Thursday March 29, 2018 @09:40PM (#16712938)
I remember realizing I could reassemble my dad's 386 out of the parts I had stopped using.

I used to go to a screwdriver shop (in Federal Way?) that had some memory and a power supply sitting around at the counter. They would POST a new CPU and board in front of you before you take them home. Less stress than ordering from some random in the Computer Shopper phonebook.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by actsasbuffoon on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:29PM (#16711212)
Ugh, this brings back bad memories. I had a new PC that wouldn't power up, and I couldn't figure out why for 2 or 3 days. Eventually I took the motherboard out of the case and then put it back in. Suddenly everything worked. The best guess I've got is that somehow the motherboard was touching the case in a way that was causing it to short out.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by squeaky-clean on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:36PM (#16711278)
Had the same thing happen to me! Built it on desk, worked, moved to case, didn't work. Rebuilt on desk, worked, moved to case, worked! Whatever, sure.

Had it happen again a couple years later but that time it turns out the motherboard was just DOA. But yeah the time spent confirming that the motherboard was the culprit sucked, and required another PC to swap parts with.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by PascLeRasc on Thursday March 29, 2018 @08:00PM (#16712390)
I just built a PC recently and thought the CPU fan header was dead until I got into the BIOS (with no fan spinning) and found that the default fan curve had the fan at -30% from 25C to 75C.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by ryan-c on Friday March 30, 2018 @12:49AM (#16713761)
...negative thirty percent?
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by morsch on Friday March 30, 2018 @05:51AM (#16714886)
A mechanism locks up the fan and supplies power to the stalled motor, bringing the CPU up to the desired temperature through resistive heating.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by danShumway on Thursday March 29, 2018 @06:14PM (#16711589)
It kind of straddles the worst line between easy and hard.

It's pretty straightforward and easy to do, so you don't get any bragging rights when you finish, but there also aren't a ton of safety nets in case you do something stupid to keep you from ruining an expensive component.

When I put together my computer, I dropped a CPU at an angle and bent one of the pins on the motherboard, then spent 3 hours flicking it with a needle to get it to realign.

It's like doing taxes - not really an accomplishment, so big whoop if you do it right, but just dangerous enough to mean you have to pay attention and take it seriously.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by ethbro on Thursday March 29, 2018 @06:53PM (#16711947)
When working with electronics, I use the CS vs EE analogy.

CS person: grabs part by hand, shuffles across the floor in socks, brushes dust off a pin, presses part into place

EE person: stares in horror, a grounding strap dangling from their hand

CS: "What?"

EE: "You know you're supposed to ground yourself to prevent static discharge from frying parts?"

CS: "Bah, it worked fine the last time I did it this way."

Point being there's a difference between something that works 99/100 times, and something that works 60/100 times. And when failure means a dead part, probably best to go the extra mile.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by nasredin on Thursday March 29, 2018 @08:59PM (#16712750)
You only ground yourself if you paid for the components.

If it's your bud's money... it will probably be fine. Just hold the beer when you are installing the CPU :)

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by penguinUzer on Friday March 30, 2018 @01:48AM (#16713982)
Being one of those "EE persons" specialized in semiconductors seeing lack of ESD protection drives me insane. I used to work on an electronics factory production floor where it was required of me to take a certification course of proper handling procedures and in the use of ESD arresting equipment.

Your PC build didn't boot? Probably shocked it. It's blue screening or kernel panicking? Probably shocked it.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by c3833174 on Friday March 30, 2018 @07:07AM (#16715163)
As someone who rebuilt a couple dozens PCs for a charity from dumpster parts, boards in plastic bags while wearing mostly synthetic clothes, I'd say you underestimate the ruggedness of those things.

Drivers and OS are much more likely to be the cause of quirks and weird behaviour.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by meuk on Friday March 30, 2018 @02:49AM (#16714228)
Hah, I am definitely aware of the danger of ESD. I just don't have a place near my desk to mount my anti-ESD wristband.

What I did instead was touching a radiator every once in a while. Is this sufficient?

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by pjc50 on Friday March 30, 2018 @04:27AM (#16714611)
Whether you're likely to experience ESD problems depends very much on the environment; if the ambient humidity is high enough and you're not wearing rubber soled shoes on a synthetic floor, it can be very low.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by Paperweight on Thursday March 29, 2018 @10:21PM (#16713168)
...and then the CS-assembled computer works perfectly while the EE-assembled computer has gremlins. That's how it usually works. :/
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by davidkuhta on Thursday March 29, 2018 @04:50PM (#16710912)
Since the great subterranean migration of 2017, catching the elusive GPU outside of a mine and in its native habitat has proved quite difficult.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by slededit on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:02PM (#16710995)
The worst part is basically all the major vendors have drastically reduced their return policies or eliminated them entirely.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by acmecorps on Thursday March 29, 2018 @06:50PM (#16711922)
Really? Do you have a source for this? This would be bad for actual gamers
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by slededit on Thursday March 29, 2018 @07:15PM (#16712098)
My source is Frys having giant signs saying final sale on all of their GPUs.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by nasredin on Thursday March 29, 2018 @09:09PM (#16712786)
I've read that GPUs are not designed to be run 24/7 e.g. bitcoin mining.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by shadowfacts on Thursday March 29, 2018 @10:58PM (#16713365)
They’re not designed to run 24/7 but they don’t have an issue with it. The GPU and the card itself have no issues running continuously.

The biggest problems come from the fans running continuously and getting worn down, and the coolers are by far the easiest part to replace.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by mellinoe on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:28PM (#16711207)
Is it really that hard to find them? I'm not that familiar with the current lineup of cards (still rocking a GTX 770 myself), but Amazon seems to have several 1050-1080 model cards in stock from various vendors. The prices do look a bit inflated, though.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by shadowfacts on Thursday March 29, 2018 @11:02PM (#16713374)
They’re hard to find for a reasonable price. The GTX 1070 had a launch price of $380. The cheapest one currently listed on PCPartPicker is about $550.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by Scoundreller on Thursday March 29, 2018 @09:49PM (#16712985)
On the plus side, I was able to sell an incredibly old ATI video card for $50 from a computer my friend was bringing to the dumpster.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by InclinedPlane on Thursday March 29, 2018 @07:48PM (#16712313)
Having done the process a few times over the last, oh, two decades, I can say that some things have gotten easier while others have gotten a bit worse.

Assembly a PC is pretty easy these days, most of the parts go together pretty easily, and your chances of everything working on the first try are pretty high. This is way different from ye olden days when it might take hours just to get a PC put together correctly unless you were lucky, hardware is a lot less fiddly these days than it used to be.

But buying all the components for a PC is more challenging for novices. This can be hard for techies to understand because we just assume that everyone knows what we know. But your J. Average prospective computer building may not know whether a Core i7 8700 is better than a Core 2 Quad or vice versa. They also may not know what the heck an 8th generation Core i7 is. There are so many generations of components now and so many gradations within each generation that it can become and informational overload. If you try to go at the problem directly by just heading to newegg or amazon and browsing for parts without doing the research you're going to have a bad time.

There are a zillion different socket formats, there are a zillion different motherboard form factors, there are a zillion different GPU lines and each one has a zillion different variations. How do you know which are compatible? How do you know which ones are the best? Or just the best for the price? Are higher numbers better? Worse? Not important? Is LGA 2066 better than LGA 1151? Is a GeForce 9800 better than a GTX 1080? There are a zillion of these little questions. Already knowing most of the answers makes navigating the problem vastly easier, having to find an answer for each and every one of them can be exhausting. You absolutely need some sort of guide or hand holding to get started on this problem from scratch but if you don't have any pre-existing knowledge you don't know where to go. (Personally, my favorite is http://www.logicalincrements.com but there are others.) You need someone to help you narrow the scope of the decision problem to a manageable level, otherwise you'll drown in choices and questions until you run out of will power to continue.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by penguinUzer on Friday March 30, 2018 @02:20AM (#16714106)
Excellent comment! Graphics card naming schemes are the worst of the lot. Without being an enthusiast and keeping up with benchmark reporting it's impossible to tell say, if an AMD RX560 is faster than an RX480. I mean 560 is a bigger number which means it's faster, right?
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by InclinedPlane on Friday March 30, 2018 @04:25PM (#16719533)
Having just done this recently, and still being fairly plugged in on what's hot vs. what's not, the worst part has been picking a motherboard. There is an infinity of different enthusiast/gaming motherboards, all of them almost, but not quite, functionally the same. And damned near every single one has an average 4 out of 5 star rating on newegg, so you have to spend eternity wading through reviews trying to decide whether or not motherboard makers are just bad or gamers are just fussy assholes (or both).
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by InitialLastName on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:05PM (#16711011)
I think folks here are missing something. It isn't assembling a gaming PC that's difficult, it's the process of building the rig; specifying parts and confirming that they're compatible can be a daunting task, much less sourcing them and recognizing the appropriate prices.

It's a really big matrix of possibilities that can be pretty opaque to people who don't keep up with it.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by jotux on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:16PM (#16711099)
There are sites now [1] that let you select components and will tell you if your CPU/motherboard/RAM are compatible. It will even tell you if your power supply can handle the amount of power of all the components. When you select components it will give you links to multiple places to purchase them.

I don't keep up with current events in custom PCs and when I built a PC last year [2] I thought it was incredibly straight forward.

[1] pcpartpicker.com

[2] https://pcpartpicker.com/b/HgBbt6

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by bsder on Thursday March 29, 2018 @06:09PM (#16711543)
Except that you have the problem right off the bat:

https://pcpartpicker.com/products/cpu/

Which CPU family and which series? Once you finish THAT, everything gets a lot more straightforward.

That list is terrible. At least order the families/series chronologically.

If I'm a reasonably informed random, I know to click a handful of things with "lake" in the name and a handful of things with "zen" in the name and that's about it. Except you can't do that with the chooser as it gives you zero choices, since -zen is a series and -lake is a family and those are disjoint (I should be able to union those).

As a noob, I would miss any of the "gaming value" choices with that heuristic (Haswell/Broadwell that are quite nice).

I don't see any EPYC in that list, so I'm scratching my head (yes, I know it's a server but a random person won't) and I would miss the Threadripper choice (why doesn't it have Ryzen next to it).

The problem isn't assembling a PC. It's the fact that PC knowledge has a half-life of like 6 months, and you really can't trust review sites or web searches on this topic anymore.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by jotux on Thursday March 29, 2018 @08:01PM (#16712404)
I suspect most newbies to building a PC wouldn't just go to the individual part list and start picking a processor. They'd go to the build guides(https://pcpartpicker.com/guide/) and look at builds in their price range. A bunch of the build guides on that site have start-to-finish youtube videos of the entire build as well.

Maybe that particular filter on that particular part isn't that easy to use but I think sites like this make building a PC extremely approachable, even for someone who has never built a PC before.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by LeoPanthera on Thursday March 29, 2018 @06:43PM (#16711844)
You're not supposed to pick a CPU from the full list. Use the filters on the left to narrow it down.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by bsder on Thursday March 29, 2018 @07:28PM (#16712193)
Did you actually read my comment? I was talking about the choices IN THE FILTERS.

The problem, as a noob, is that you don't even have enough knowledge to use the filters correctly.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by pcarmichael on Thursday March 29, 2018 @08:56PM (#16712731)
Aye. We've got some things in the works to improve that.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by j-c-hewitt on Thursday March 29, 2018 @06:17PM (#16711607)
Used to be daunting, but for my last few builds I have used some combination of PC Part Picker and the selections from the seasonal TechReport.com guides. Much easier than a couple decades ago when I was a teenager.

Should also be mentioned that the manuals that come with things like motherboards and cases are much more detailed than they used to be.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by nasredin on Thursday March 29, 2018 @09:14PM (#16712810)
PCPP is useful to look up if your build or a build similar to yours is gonna have problems or little gotchas.

PCPP is really revolutionary. Building a PC in 2018 should be easy.

The only priblem is a lot of everchanging technologies and acronyms, e.g. NVMe, M.2, etc.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by InitialLastName on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:47PM (#16711361)
Yeah I'm not saying it's hard for me, but I've built a few (using pcpartpicker) and do a lot of electronic design work, so I'm comfortable handling PCB's.

For others, even just pcpartpicker can present an overload of information.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by onli on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:14PM (#16711082)
There are several sites that help with that. I built one of them: https://www.pc-kombo.com/ - it gives you the best cpu + gpu for your budget, based on benchmarks, with fitting parts around that. The most known is https://pcpartpicker.com/, which gives you a broad selection of parts and checks compatibility as well.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by brownbat on Thursday March 29, 2018 @06:33PM (#16711748)
That's a great concept, I always wondered why "best X for the money" (like the columns on tomshardware) weren't just automated, given the availability of crowdsourced benchmarks (http://www.userbenchmark.com).

I wish I could specify other specific priorities, like video conversion or compression or data management, so it would trade off between CPU, SSD speed, SSD storage space, or RAM in slightly different ways (though maybe that level of optimization is overkill).

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by onli on Thursday March 29, 2018 @08:52PM (#16712703)
Thanks!

> I wish I could specify other specific priorities

I tend to think that's overkill :) But one can toggle between a gamer setup and a mainly more more cpu heavy app focus, it's in the advanced menu under the recommend button. Switching between gpu and cpu heavy builds catches a lot of those different usecases.

> given the availability of crowdsourced benchmarks (http://www.userbenchmark.com).

One problem with those is that they are often based on artificial benchmarks, which is most of the time not what you want. I use benchmark results from professional publications instead. The problem then moves to ordering, but that's manageable with enough data.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by brownbat on Friday March 30, 2018 @12:46AM (#16713749)
> > I wish I could specify other specific priorities

> I tend to think that's overkill :)

Yeah, I think you're right. It's like that old Knuth quote. Programmers waste enormous amounts of time worrying about the speed of noncritical parts of programs.

> I use benchmark results from professional publications instead.

Yeah, I generally do that too, I just thought userbenchmarks would be easier to API and be more comprehensive.

Though thinking about it now, I'm not sure why I distrust UB so much. In a sense I'm just choosing different biases. Even if I find a reliable reviewer that personally buys each part at a retailer to avoid "reviewer binning," the best case, I still risk a sampling error due to the small numbers (typically n = 1) tested. The bell curves on two different CPUs might overlap considerably. So buying a marginally better rated processor might only give you better performance in 51% of purchases.

No professional reviewer could afford the cost or time to individually buy and test a statistically significant number of devices to determine its variance in operation.

On the other hand, the errors in judgment that might creep in from variance due to small samples are almost certainly washed out completely by the leaps between generations, right? So trustworthy reviewers are probably "good enough" and worrying about that issue is another form of unnecessary optimization, as much overkill as my first idea.

I'm open to that possibility.

Though we might go further down this line... Maybe the performance exaggerations due to conformance to published benchmarks aren't much of an issue either. As long as we're talking about ranking cards for real world usage, the odds that a card will perform noticeably better at benchmarks but noticeably worse at tasks I care about is... Well it's nonzero, but small. Smaller still if we upgrade our threshold from "noticeably" to "significantly" or "substantially."

I mean, it's your own call where you pull your data from because no data is perfect, and we probably pull from the same places. But you really got me running thinking everything is needless optimization and now I can't stop. :)

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by onli on Friday March 30, 2018 @05:03AM (#16714731)
I wanted to write "the problem is less the unprofessionalism of the benchmarkers, but the kind of benchmarks they are running. Not being real games they won't accurately reflect performance in them." Ofc, that is kind of the bias I work with, gaming performance is the most important factor, it's the default profile. But actually, the average benchmark position of gpus is pretty good. It looks like they were very careful in selecting synthetic benchmarks that reflect gaming performance accurately. Did that change?

I now look at cpus again.... yeah, there it would not work, that is too far off of what I see in gaming performance. But cpus are hard, with single and multi/threaded performance differing so much and having different effects in each game you look at.

So imho one could only use the gpu ranking, but the gpus are not hard to rank anyway :)

But now I wonder whether that would not be a good data source for SSD and HDD performance. Maybe even for RAM...

Thanks for your thoughts, you made me take a second look on something I had discarded earlier!

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by snvzz on Friday March 30, 2018 @05:57AM (#16714912)
pc-kombo doesn't seem to have a way to disable buying Windows. It screws the calculations, because it picks one among several versions of different prices.

A shame.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by onli on Friday March 30, 2018 @07:16AM (#16715204)
Hey, thanks for the feedback. You can click on the minus sign at the top right of the box to disable windows (or any other component category) - and it does not pick Windows when building a new recommendation list, one has to do that manually.

That probably got missed by not being able to remove windows just by using the arrows at the left of the box, right?

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by snvzz on Friday March 30, 2018 @07:56AM (#16715369)
It's confusing.

Now I see there's just a windows logo, but no actual windows pre-picked.

Why not put something else than a windows logo in there, when it's not filled?

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by onli on Friday March 30, 2018 @02:47PM (#16718751)
Do you have a suggestion? I needed something that says "here is the place for the operating system".
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by snvzz on Friday March 30, 2018 @05:03PM (#16719771)
I'm not good at this sort of thing, so all I can do is suggest not using the logo of an actual, specific, operating system.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by jrs95 on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:51PM (#16711388)
I’ve actually had the opposite experience. Figuring out what parts to use is pretty easy, just takes a little time and attention to detail. Actually getting everything assembled can be a huge pain in the ass, I feel like it’s all designed for people with tiny hands.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by wtallis on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:11PM (#16711052)
Using a tool like PCPartPicker takes almost all of the effort and uncertainty out of planning a build.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by pbhjpbhj on Friday March 30, 2018 @07:09AM (#16715169)
I've only built a couple of PCs but my method has been to find a PC for sale that is outside my price range - check for Linux compatibility by searching for problems - and then source the parts that match the spec. I can modify as I go, double up on RAM or whatever.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by falcolas on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:23PM (#16711160)
I just did this part a week ago. All I did was keep the motherboard specs open in one window, and narrow down choices based off that. Wasn’t really hard in any respect, just detail orientated.

Pick a processor, that determines the motherboard socket. The motherboard and CPU arch will determine the memory type. The wattage of the CPU and video card determines your PSU lower bounds.

The only odd thing was the addition of SSDs on a stick, but the motherboard determines the options there too.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by eat_veggies on Thursday March 29, 2018 @08:11PM (#16712450)
PCPartPicker will not let you pick parts that aren't compatible with each other, and even keeps a tally of your wattages. I think they even use the measurements of your case to tell you if your GPU or cooler might be too big.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by falcolas on Friday March 30, 2018 @09:29AM (#16715853)
My point was not that I'm better than tooling, but that it's a very possible task even without extra tooling. And that task isn't hard, just detail orientated.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by chx on Thursday March 29, 2018 @06:16PM (#16711602)
http://www.logicalincrements.com/ is your friend even more in the "I didn't keep up" case than pcpartpicker
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by trey-jones on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:07PM (#16711023)
It's been a while, but I'm pretty sure the shopping is the fun part.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by InitialLastName on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:11PM (#16711053)
Maybe for some people, but for others it can be a big, risky outlay of a significant amount of money.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by drak0n1c on Thursday March 29, 2018 @04:51PM (#16710925)
Motherboard articles proudly promote a dim view of hardware, which is unfortunate for a publication with that name.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by Infernal on Thursday March 29, 2018 @07:52PM (#16712340)
The last computer I built required soldering and Digi-Key. As I found out after lots of trial and error, I got a bad molex-to-sata power adapter, and it took killing two hard drives before I narrowed it down to that cable. The SATA end was too narrow to get a multimeter in. I suspect the 12v and 5v lines were crossed.

Long story short, a couple of resistors and diodes later my WD Blues were spinning up again, but it was a pain in the ass.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by urda on Thursday March 29, 2018 @04:51PM (#16710924)
It will do you well to remember HN isn't the entire world. For many gamers out there building their first PC is a scary and daunting step.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by sp332 on Thursday March 29, 2018 @04:54PM (#16710936)
I've heard people say that before they actually put a PC together. Afterwards every one of them said "Oh, that wasn't so bad!" At least, in the last 15 years... The days of AGP and PCI-X and sharp-edged rolled-steel cases were a little more fraught.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by giobox on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:13PM (#16711067)
AGP/PCI-X wasn't really any more difficult to work with than today's PCI Express etc.

You really have to rewind to mid 90's pre-Windows 95 in the days before Plug 'n' Play when manually assigning IRQs etc was a thing before the process of building your own PC meaningfully changes in my opinion.

> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plug_and_play

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by Zenst on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:33PM (#16711257)
Still, all a skill set of experience that has it's uses today and when it comes to IRQ sharing and all those years the golden leason is read the motherboard documentation and don't assume shipping defaults jumpers/setting can be wrong.

Still, before AGP we had VESA, also around the time of MCA and IBM's attempt to capture some copyright patent control back from the expanding PC market and BIOS clones ("Halt and Catch Fire" Season one well worth a watch if you missed that era in life).

Yes pre Windows 95 was a fine art, from tweaking DOS memory, to optimising windows .ini files and then the fun of having to dial up Microsoft's patch BBS for a TCP/IP stack.

But top-end gaming PC's back then, sure made less noise.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by jerf on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:30PM (#16711219)
Sounds like you skipped over the phase where Plug 'n' Play was mandatory, but didn't work reliably past maybe 1.5 expansion cards, and required even more arcane ways of configuring hardware than the IRQ days.

Or possibly you had money to buy higher quality components than I did at the time.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by sp332 on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:26PM (#16711190)
Right, but you had to match all the parts you were buying. It's easier now that everything is ATX and PCI-e. And before Amazon and Newegg, return policies were patchy.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by dragonwriter on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:43PM (#16711338)
> And before Amazon and Newegg, return policies were patchy.

OTOH, before the main consumer storefronts were the kind of flea markets of no-name sellers that used to roll into county fairgrounds every couple months, you could actually find good retailers with not only strong return policies, but also focussed on quality parts with a high S/N ratio in their catalog, that even offered added value (including, e.g., mounting CPU and memory when bought with a motherboard.)

Some of those same places survived, but they don't do consumer retail anymore.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by sp332 on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:52PM (#16711395)
That's true, and they would proactively look out for compatibility issues if they knew what your project was. Amazon can check car parts for compatibility, but as far as I know, they don't have anything like that for PC parts.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by jotm on Thursday March 29, 2018 @06:38PM (#16711797)
Hah, that brings back some memories. Configuring IRQs just right for that ISA Sound Blaster to work (after fiddling with drivers, as well)
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by stouset on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:11PM (#16711057)
Shit, I’ve done it before (years ago) and did it again somewhat recently.

It’s nerve-wracking as hell. Closing the swingarm to hold the CPU in place feels like—as the article’s author points out—you’re 100% about to destroy a really expensive piece of hardware. Installing the CPU cooler was surprisingly difficult, and I only noticed that the pins holding it attached weren’t fully seated because I checked and rechecked the mounting. Every time you plug a cable in there’s a moment of doubt if it’s the right cable or if you’re about to overvolt something and melt it. Even when you’re done plugging everything in there’s anxiety around whether or not you’ve missed something like a fan cable, that will eventually result in an expensive piece of hardware overheating and taking out the entire machine.

The act of pressing the power button when you’re all done isn’t an exciting and satisfying one. It’s a massive surge of anxiety followed by a wave of relief, followed by more nagging anxiety that gradually fades.

Even then you’re not done. After fiddling around in the BIOS for an hour to set things up, I ran a benchmark and discovered that I hadn’t used the right profile for my RAM, and it was only using half of its performance potential. Apparently many other people did this too, because the benchmark showed a graph of others’ performance in comparison and it had two equal-sized peaks: one where it was misconfigured to a slower (but presumably safe for all configurations) speed, and one where it was operating at its published speed. It took a few hours of research to discover something called XMP—which I still have no idea what it is—that apparently allows my motherboard to detect RAM timings in a way that unlocks this performance. I never would have noticed this without the benchmark.

I also noticed that my new NVMe SSD wasn’t performing well. Turns out the heat spreader my motherboard uses actually worsens performance for whatever reason. Simple fix: open the box back up, disconnect cables until I can get to the m.2 slot, and remove the heat spreader. More anxiety follows: am I just killing this expensive SSD?

Every step of the way is like this. I am not a naturally anxious person. I am financially well-off, and easily able to eat the cost of any mistakes. I am extremely technically inclined. Expecting nontechnical people to do this with limited budgets and expensive components is nuts.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by wtallis on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:27PM (#16711197)
Almost all of those fears you enumerate are unfounded. You won't kill a processor through overheating if you forget to plug in a fan. Not properly securing your CPU heatsink only really poses a risk to the GPU that it could fall onto. Likewise for your concerns about the SSD's temperature: it'll throttle itself and shutdown if necessary, but the latter won't happen even if you're blowing 85°C air from a GPU directly onto the SSD—I've tested that with most of the M.2 NVMe SSDs on the market. There are essentially zero connectors inside the PC that allow for the mechanical possibility of connecting dangerous voltages to the expensive components.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by stouset on Thursday March 29, 2018 @06:38PM (#16711803)
Whether or not those fears are well-founded is beside the point. I know that components will undergo a safe thermal shutdown. I know that power cables mostly can't go anywhere they shouldn't go. And I still get anxiety around it, even as a person who doesn't get much anxiety. Expecting a nontechnical novice to feel comfortable doing these things is asking a lot.

Plus, there's still a lot that actually can go wrong. Crappy PSUs and built up static electricity have killed uncountable motherboards and GPUs. Misconfiguring your BIOS can actually kill your components, sometimes quickly and sometimes slowly.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by slededit on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:53PM (#16711408)
But back in the P4 days man was it easy to melt your expensive processor. They didn't have fancy things like thermal shutdown then either.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by wtallis on Thursday March 29, 2018 @06:19PM (#16711627)
Thermal shutdown was added fairly early in the P4 days. I recall a Tom's Hardware video showing removing the heatsink from a P4 while it was running Quake 3 and the framerate tanking but no crash, while the Athlon (XP?) next to it went up in smoke when the heatsink was removed.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by jotm on Thursday March 29, 2018 @06:41PM (#16711836)
That was for AMDs, and I believe by the time of Pentium 4, even Athlons had thermal safeties. I remember quick testing (see if it powers on) Pentium 3s, Celerons and P4s without the heatsink - they even managed to boot Windows before shutting down lol. Same for GPUs.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by slededit on Thursday March 29, 2018 @06:47PM (#16711888)
I managed to melt one by incorrectly applying a heatsink. Years later we did some "experiments" on an old P4 to test the cooling capabilities of scotch. It's not effective FYI.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by stouset on Friday March 30, 2018 @03:14PM (#16718964)
Funnily enough, a friend of mine had his GPU die due to heat yesterday. He'd been mucking about with performance settings, and apparently set his MSI card to use too much power and not enough fan.

GPU hit > 95˚C and is now a several hundred dollar paperweight.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by urda on Thursday March 29, 2018 @06:09PM (#16711541)
I just wanted to say you did a great job of bundling up all those nerves, anxiety, and feelings about getting your own rig up and running. Great comment.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by sundvor on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:22PM (#16711144)
I hear you.

On my latest Asus motherboard, an Asus Strix Gaming, choosing XMP timings with an otherwise mild overclock overvolted the 6850k in a voltage setting I wasn't even aware of (not vcore) in such a way that the CPU died over time - my last build was a 2600k, which is now son's computer (OCed, and working fine).

This happened twice. Computer shop couldn't figure it out and replaced the CPU on warranty. Not Intel's fault, yet they copped it. I should have insisted on a new motherboard as well, very frustrating.

Fortunately I somehow discovered the hyper aggressive setting not too far into my third. I know it is at least a bit degraded, but oh well...

In 3 years I'll try an AMD. ;)

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by makomk on Thursday March 29, 2018 @08:15PM (#16712483)
The whole point of XMP is that it overvolts the RAM, which in turn increases the voltage the on-CPU memory controller runs at. That's why the XMP timings are faster than the stock timings. So it's probably kind of Intel's fault, since XMP is their invention.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by sundvor on Thursday March 29, 2018 @10:42PM (#16713270)
Ok - order is restored then, as it is pretty much advertised as "these are settings that will run your ram optimally".
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by khedoros1 on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:50PM (#16711379)
Hmm. I've always thought it was exciting and fun, even when I didn't have the money to replace parts in a potentially-botched installation. I can see where you could get a feeling of anxiety from, but that was never my experience.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by elcapitan on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:04PM (#16711006)
The scary part is actually not building it but looking up a dozen components with weird detailled descriptions and figuring out what that stuff actually means. Then getting back at it two years later and finding most names completely changed.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by drak0n1c on Thursday March 29, 2018 @04:54PM (#16710940)
The problem with Motherboard is the way they talk about hardware. The pessimistic voice makes it seem not worth the trouble. They aren't even trying to spark curiosity in their readers and it's a disservice.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by getsugablitz2 on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:02PM (#16710993)
It certainly can be daunting at first, I generally just get a bit frustrated when people assert a task is too hard when all it really requires is some concentration and research.

If the argument were "I have other things I prefer to spend time on" then I would completely understand, but rejecting it as too hard seems somewhat lazy unless I'm just overestimating the average person's ability.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by castis on Thursday March 29, 2018 @04:57PM (#16710961)
Everything is scary and daunting if you've not researched it properly and step into it thinking you have.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by ArlenBales on Thursday March 29, 2018 @06:56PM (#16711967)
Two of my friends build bicycles from scratch, but they find building a PC difficult. I argue that their hobby is ten times more complex than building a PC nowadays, as everything is mostly plug-in-play and idiot-proof. Installing the CPU in a mobo is a walk-in-the-park compared to truing your wheel or overhaul a hub.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by penguinUzer on Friday March 30, 2018 @02:12AM (#16714074)
I disagree on being 10x harder. Bicycles are the same concept just older. There is a frame (computer case/mobo) and you bolt on compatible parts like brakes, cranks, forks, wheels, etc. (cpu/memory/gpu/psu)

I'm sure if you talk to someone working at a bike shop they could take your comment, flip it, and still have it be accurate:

Two of my friends build PCs from scratch, but they find building a bicycle difficult. I argue that their hobby is ten times more complex than building a bicycle nowadays, as everything is mostly plug-in-play and idiot-proof. Truing your wheel or overhaul a hub is a walk-in-the-park compared to installing the CPU.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by jandrese on Thursday March 29, 2018 @04:50PM (#16710910)
It can get arcane getting the right socket mobo for your processor, getting the correct timings on the RAM, figuring out how much power supply you need to buy...

And then there's those poorly documented nonstandardized fiddly little wire connectors for all of the front panel functions, plus another set for the USB ports and so on. To this day I'm never sure which way to plug in the LEDs, and even when I think I have it down I'll run into a mobo that does it the opposite way. And then your case has a three pin power switch (outer two wired up), but the motherboard only has two pins for it...

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by chx on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:09PM (#16711037)
I think your comment is, what, a decade out of date?

First of all, pcpartpicker and logicalincrements will help you choosing the right CPU with the right motherboard. Correct timings on RAM hasn't been a thing for many, many years, they work, at worst it won't use the maximum possibility the module offers. The PSU is hardly a problem, unless you are spending an extraordinary amount of money, the smallest PSU you can realistically buy is an overkill (CPU is 65W typically, very few GPUs go above 150W, and you can't even get a below 350W PSU really unless you have some office prebuilt from HP or Dell).

The front I/O pretty much has standardized on Intel https://www.intel.com/content/dam/support/us/en/images/mothe... and most cases have a single block now.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by jandrese on Friday March 30, 2018 @11:28AM (#16716870)
It's probably fine when you're buying everything new today. Building computers out of salvage parts adds a lot of complication.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by penguinUzer on Friday March 30, 2018 @01:59AM (#16714030)
I used to think this way until recently. I literally have an engineering degree in electronics and it takes me hours to research a compatible set of components. A lay person stands no chance!

A couple of examples off the top of my head: AMD RX480 power draw exceeds the pci-express current limit specification and bricked motherboards, hence I bought/overclocked an RX470 instead. Intel 6700k overclocking. Wow. Reading and understanding the thermal and power envelopes described in the 300 page datasheet difficult for me, it would be impossible for a lay person to comprehend.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by dfxm12 on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:13PM (#16711075)
Meh, "gaming" is the operative word in that sentence. It's not just building a PC, it's knowing what components are required to run today's games, while leaving enough room for future-proofing against next {year|month|week}'s games.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by paxys on Thursday March 29, 2018 @04:55PM (#16710947)
Why is that so surprising? It is hard even for technically-inclined users, let alone regular ones.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by maksimum on Thursday March 29, 2018 @04:59PM (#16710968)
Define 'hard'.

To me, almost anything that can be completed in a fixed amount of time with high probability isn't hard; it's tedious at most. But if it can be completed within one hour it's not even tedious, it's (IMO) 'easy'.

For something to be 'hard', there should be a reasonable chance of failure with associated non-trivial costs.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by Symbiote on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:06PM (#16711021)
> a reasonable chance of failure with associated non-trivial costs.

Any single part of a computer is a non-trivial cost if broken, and it's not too difficult to imagine the situations where that might happen: bending a pin on a CPU, giving a static shock to a component, misapplying thermal paste.

Even for enthusiasts, this is a task they do perhaps every 3 years, and every time with different components.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by squeaky-clean on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:20PM (#16711120)
> bending a pin on a CPU, giving a static shock to a component, misapplying thermal paste.

Pins are in the socket now and very small, pretty much impossible to bend without negligence. Thermal paste is also usually pre-applied to the stock cooler, and you won't need to apply your own unless you're using an aftermarket cooler and overclocking.

Static shock is probably the only real concern but honestly I've built at least 20 PCs, at least 5 while wearing socks on a carpet. I've just never seen it be an issue or even met someone in real life who shocked hardware.

Parts are also much more durable than you'd initially believe. I competed in a PC building race (weird, right?) and most builds took 2 minutes or less (some stuff was pre-assembled). Hardware was slammed into motherboards as fast as possible, clumsily dropped on the floor, no regard for static. No attendee had any hardware issues.

> Even for enthusiasts, this is a task they do perhaps every 3 years, and every time with different components.

Nah, for those of us who love it, we'll gladly build your PC for free (for friends) if you buy the parts, I'll even double check the build first. Though I do try to haggle a six pack of beer out of the deal.

Example of modern pins:

https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/MSI/Z170A_GAMING_M7/imag...

http://i65.tinypic.com/w1y22t.jpg

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by MertsA on Thursday March 29, 2018 @11:42PM (#16713510)
>No attendee had any hardware issues.

I did this back in highschool as well. We actually did have a team one year who broke a computer but that's because they were bleeding all over everything. There's a surprising amount of blood in these competitions when you're racing to put components into a completely unknown case with sharp edges all over.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by squeaky-clean on Friday March 30, 2018 @12:08PM (#16717294)
Hahaha that's great. I like to joke that every computer requires a blood sacrifice. It usually happens when trying to fit that damn I/O shield in.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by paulmd on Thursday March 29, 2018 @06:14PM (#16711580)
LGA sockets are even more nerve-wracking, it's still easy to bend pins and unlike PGA it's difficult to bend them back properly.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by wtallis on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:18PM (#16711108)
Most CPUs these days don't have pins to be bent. Killing a PC component with static shock is more difficult than you imagine and is pretty hard to do even if you aren't taking serious precautions like using anti-static wrist straps. Misapplying thermal past won't kill anything unless you use so much that it oozes out from the CPU-heatsink joint and short-circuits stuff on the motherboard (and that's assuming that your heatsink doesn't have thermal compound pre-applied, and that the aftermarket thermal compound you're using is actually electrically conductive).

It takes willful ignorance and disregard for the simple instructions included with each component to even have a chance at breaking the expensive things.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by lfowles on Thursday March 29, 2018 @06:28PM (#16711697)
> Killing a PC component with static shock is more difficult than you imagine and is pretty hard to do even if you aren't taking serious precautions like using anti-static wrist straps

Can confirm, got a little lazy and put spare components together into a working system on the carpet this past weekend. Everything still works well enough. :)

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by drngdds on Thursday March 29, 2018 @06:11PM (#16711556)
It's more a combination of scary and tedious, especially if you haven't done it before and need to research everything.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by sundvor on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:12PM (#16711062)
There will be blood. ;)

And you will put too much paste on, or not enough.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by sundvor on Thursday March 29, 2018 @10:45PM (#16713288)
Whoever downvoted (and that's fine!) must only have worked on these modern cases with no sharp edges.

Back in the days it was almost recommended to increase the iron in your diet prior to commencing a PC build.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by sincerely on Thursday March 29, 2018 @04:54PM (#16710943)
it is definitely harder than most PC building enthusiasts make it sound
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by ovao on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:03PM (#16710999)
I haven’t built many machines over the years, but to me it’s less like ‘hard’ and more like ‘scary’. The line about locking down CPUs feeling like breaking hundreds of dollars of hardware 100% of the time is a very real thing.

Otherwise it’s the usual dread of whether the damn thing will actually boot. These days, though, they’re much better at booting than they are at not booting, so most of that nail biting is gone.

Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by khedoros1 on Thursday March 29, 2018 @06:06PM (#16711505)
Honestly, it's mostly just detail-oriented. Some people might not pick it up easily, while others will. All the hardware-building forums and such make it easier than it used to be.
Re:'PC Building Simulator' Is More Fun Than Building a Real ... by penguinUzer on Friday March 30, 2018 @02:14AM (#16714081)
A lot of it is RTFM. If someone won't read the manual for their lawn mower or car they sure aren't going to bother for their computer.