[dead]
Re:Self-driving Uber car kills Arizona woman crossing street
by moscovium on Monday March 19, 2018 @01:05PM
(#16620182)
Not intentionally programming them to run red lights, just intentionally or unintentionally not taking necessary precautions to prevent it from happening. They can get it right, or have it right now, and it's pretty clear which side they've chosen.
Re:Self-driving Uber car kills Arizona woman crossing street
by taoistextremist on Monday March 19, 2018 @01:05PM
(#16620178)
Nobody is suggesting they're doing that. They're saying Uber cuts corners to save a dime among other unethical practices (like stealing research from competitors).
Re:Self-driving Uber car kills Arizona woman crossing street
by sitkack on Monday March 19, 2018 @01:11PM
(#16620276)
Uber is embodiment of its employees. It is a flame that the unethical moths are drawn to, so they can realize their vision by the means that delight them. Uber is the Phoenix of Enron.
Re:Self-driving Uber car kills Arizona woman crossing street
by krisdol on Monday March 19, 2018 @01:23PM
(#16620453)
Its employees operate within the culture and norms established by its owners and investors.
Re:Self-driving Uber car kills Arizona woman crossing street
by eckza on Monday March 19, 2018 @01:24PM
(#16620477)
[deleted]
[sorry, dang. you're right.]
Re:Self-driving Uber car kills Arizona woman crossing street
by dang on Monday March 19, 2018 @01:34PM
(#16620649)
Please don't reply to a bad comment with another bad comment. That just makes this place worse for everybody.
Re:Self-driving Uber car kills Arizona woman crossing street
by eckza on Monday March 19, 2018 @01:43PM
(#16620794)
You're right. Thanks for calling me out.
Re:Self-driving Uber car kills Arizona woman crossing street
by stochastic_monk on Monday March 19, 2018 @01:04PM
(#16620165)
They stand to gain by being quicker to market by failing to instantiate adequate safeguards.
Criminal negligence, not direct malicious criminality.
Re:Self-driving Uber car kills Arizona woman crossing street
by gt_ on Monday March 19, 2018 @01:22PM
(#16620443)
Not a bad business plan. The market rewards risk. I’ll use Uber as an example.
Re:Self-driving Uber car kills Arizona woman crossing street
by stochastic_monk on Monday March 19, 2018 @01:23PM
(#16620464)
This is why unregulated growth makes cancer the perfect metaphor for corporations.
Re:Self-driving Uber car kills Arizona woman crossing street
by Mononokay on Monday March 19, 2018 @01:20PM
(#16620405)
The art of being cheap and the virtue of being lazy oft end with someone getting hurt, and Uber embodies both of those quite well.
Re:Self-driving Uber car kills Arizona woman crossing street
by netsharc on Monday March 19, 2018 @01:07PM
(#16620219)
Not intentionally doing that, but, intentionally ignoring bugs.
"Sir, we have several bugs, one of them would cause the car to run a red in the following conditions... [fictional made-up condition: in case it sees a clown car with Brad Pitt wearing a pink dress in it]".
"What are the chances of that ever happening? Ship it!".
Re:Self-driving Uber car kills Arizona woman crossing street
by dpwm on Monday March 19, 2018 @01:26PM
(#16620522)
I somewhat doubt they even know or care that there might be bugs before they do something awful. It's like they're using the public highway as their simulator.
I don't know if this job ad for a self-driving simulation software engineer is still current, but it is somewhat worrying given the broad scope of the role they appear to be advertising for.
Re:Self-driving Uber car kills Arizona woman crossing street
by citizenkeen on Monday March 19, 2018 @01:05PM
(#16620185)
I think it's more what Uber stands to gain from not ensuring that their cars are programmed to not run red lights. Which is first-to-market advantage.
Re:Self-driving Uber car kills Arizona woman crossing street
by pretentiousPear on Monday March 19, 2018 @01:05PM
(#16620181)
No one said that this was their intention.