Re:Economist behind Uber study admits error, adjusts numbers
by icebraining on Wednesday March 07, 2018 @01:04PM
(#16538355)
So Uber was the only company willing to hire that guy when everyone else rejected him, and somehow that's a blow against Uber?
Re:Economist behind Uber study admits error, adjusts numbers
by ksenzee on Wednesday March 07, 2018 @01:19PM
(#16538480)
Hire him? Not hardly. If they did that they'd have to pay minimum wage and cover FICA.
Re:Economist behind Uber study admits error, adjusts numbers
by icebraining on Wednesday March 07, 2018 @01:29PM
(#16538566)
"Hire a contractor" is a common phrase in English, even federal agencies use it: https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/0242-hiring-contractor
Re:Economist behind Uber study admits error, adjusts numbers
by notfromhere on Wednesday March 07, 2018 @01:33PM
(#16538601)
The point is that uber isn't economically sustainable for the driver
One guy that particularly stuck out had been an engineer at GE working on modifying helicopter engines for desert conditions for the US military (they ultimately made tolerances bigger and it fixed the sand problems counter intuitively). He then had a failed start-up and was driving because he couldn't find any work because of the gap in his CV (as he told it). Said he hated driving and it didn't pay the bills but he didn't know what else to do.
We all have plenty of anecdotal evidence. But maybe things are different in NYC than out west.