Re:A Reimplementation of Winamp 2.9 in HTML5 and JavaScript
by pcocko on Thursday February 08, 2018 @02:24PM
(#16334804)
Winamp + dialup connection. How many hours have we lost downloading a bunch of mp3 files...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A Reimplementation of Winamp 2.9 in HTML5 and JavaScript
by pjmlp on Thursday February 08, 2018 @02:47PM
(#16335012)
That is why those of us that could do it, would bring our ZIP drives to the university labs and plug them into the parallel port. :)
Re:A Reimplementation of Winamp 2.9 in HTML5 and JavaScript
by sergiotapia on Thursday February 08, 2018 @03:31PM
(#16335334)
23 minutes to download Usher - Yeah and Outkast - Hey Ya!.mp3 - those were the days.
Re:A Reimplementation of Winamp 2.9 in HTML5 and JavaScript
by function_seven on Thursday February 08, 2018 @04:08PM
(#16335607)
For a brief moment of my life, I got up as soon as my alarm went off. It was always exciting to see what MP3s were downloaded overnight from the queue.
Re:A Reimplementation of Winamp 2.9 in HTML5 and JavaScript
by maxxxxx on Thursday February 08, 2018 @04:16PM
(#16335665)
Somehow it was more fun and you felt like you had accomplished something when you had a complete album. Things are too easy today :)
Re:A Reimplementation of Winamp 2.9 in HTML5 and JavaScript
by gorbachev on Friday February 09, 2018 @01:41AM
(#16338395)
You mean USHERY~1.MP3?
:)
Re:A Reimplementation of Winamp 2.9 in HTML5 and JavaScript
by deadmetheny on Thursday February 08, 2018 @05:29PM
(#16336174)
I was more a fan of Spin Doctors - Pretty Baby and Tony Hawks Pro Skater - Superman, personally
Re:A Reimplementation of Winamp 2.9 in HTML5 and JavaScript
by anderspitman on Thursday February 08, 2018 @04:19PM
(#16335679)
Dialup? Lucky. I had 14.4k through my dad's Startac until I was about 15.
Re:A Reimplementation of Winamp 2.9 in HTML5 and JavaScript
by terrantech on Thursday February 08, 2018 @09:28PM
(#16337438)
That's still Dial-up.
56k was just the last version of Dial-up. I started on 9600baud (9.6k) and it started well before that even, at something like 0.1k.
Re:A Reimplementation of Winamp 2.9 in HTML5 and JavaScript
by anderspitman on Friday February 09, 2018 @06:22PM
(#16344690)
In my experience almost anyone referring to dialup is talking about 56.6k, or at the very least some sort of modem connected to the PTSN, screeching noises and all. Is your experience different?
Re:A Reimplementation of Winamp 2.9 in HTML5 and JavaScript
by StavrosK on Thursday February 08, 2018 @07:17PM
(#16336807)
You had the internet through a mobile phone and you're calling dial up lucky? Mobile phones were legit space age back then.
Re:A Reimplementation of Winamp 2.9 in HTML5 and JavaScript
by yitchelle on Thursday February 08, 2018 @05:50PM
(#16336287)
Too many, I'm afraid. But do you remember the first time you had broadband and the time needed to download an mp3 was so short that you can't queue up the next download.
Re:A Reimplementation of Winamp 2.9 in HTML5 and JavaScript
by digi_owl on Friday February 09, 2018 @01:40AM
(#16338387)
Had a aimilar experience recently after getting a fiber line installed and grabbing a game off Steam. Would have taken me hours on the old DSL, never mind a 33.6 dial-up.
I think my aging LAN gear capped out way before the fiber did, and an upgrade is on my todo list. ;)
Re:A Reimplementation of Winamp 2.9 in HTML5 and JavaScript
by gorbachev on Friday February 09, 2018 @01:40AM
(#16338386)
I moved dorms almost entirely for this reason when I was in College. The new dorms were being built with a broadband Internet connection straight into the College network.
It was leecher heaven!
That is until some wiseass thought it'd be a good idea to run a private ftp site for a piracy group from their dorm room. The damn thing saturated the entire network until they got caught.
Re:A Reimplementation of Winamp 2.9 in HTML5 and JavaScript
by glandium on Thursday February 08, 2018 @08:40PM
(#16337228)
I didn't have internet in my dorm, so I was downloading mp3s at university and retrieving them at home by floppy disk. That is, 128kbps mp3s, which is about 1MB per minute (iirc), on 1.44MB floppy disks. split(1) to the rescue. I did the same for (short) videos too. Crazy days.
Re:A Reimplementation of Winamp 2.9 in HTML5 and JavaScript
by digi_owl on Thursday February 08, 2018 @08:43PM
(#16337239)
I think i pissed off some kids in the neighborhood when i started doing CDRs for the cost of the disc (or bring your own and i'll fill it up), when they had been selling them at a 100% (or more) markup...
Re:A Reimplementation of Winamp 2.9 in HTML5 and JavaScript
by turtlebits on Friday February 09, 2018 @01:41PM
(#16342759)
I still remember zipping/splitting files to fit on floppies. I permanently have the number 1457664 (size of a 1.44MB 3.5") in my head.
Re:A Reimplementation of Winamp 2.9 in HTML5 and JavaScript
by ilkkao on Friday February 09, 2018 @09:10AM
(#16340238)
For me the phone bill was even bigger issuer than slow download speed. Our local telephone company charged more than $1 per hour for all calls. I remember my parents being furious after seeing the bills.