News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Changes to the YouTube Partner Program by x0x0 on Wednesday January 17, 2018 @03:42AM (#16166427)
Because youtube attracts a lot of brand advertisers: think Cheerios, Volvo, Swiffer, etc. These ads are designed to create awareness of the products and to create warm feelings for the brand. Hence cute kids eat Cheerios or Volvo brags about safety or Swiffer shows how easy it is to have an immaculate mansion.

All of the above dread showing up next to eg some jackass going to a suicide forest and showing a dead person for kicks. Showing ads primarily against bigger videos means youtube has a chance to check the content. ie so-called brand safety.

See how the ad industry views the changes:

http://www.adweek.com/digital/youtube-is-finally-addressing-...

Re:Changes to the YouTube Partner Program by zimpenfish on Wednesday January 17, 2018 @05:46AM (#16166919)
> Showing ads primarily against bigger videos

Which does fall down somewhat when the jackass going to a suicide forest is one of the biggest creators (estimated 4th highest paid in 2017) -and- was a Preferred Partner.

> means youtube has a chance to check the content

Sure but they apparently approved his suicide forest video.

https://www.polygon.com/2018/1/9/16869430/youtube-logan-paul...

"[...] YouTube moderation team had reviewed Paul’s video and deemed it acceptable."

Re:Changes to the YouTube Partner Program by prepend on Wednesday January 17, 2018 @07:32AM (#16167350)
It helps a lot against all the ISIS videos that show ads where Google is getting a lot of heat in Europe.
Re:Changes to the YouTube Partner Program by AstralStorm on Wednesday January 17, 2018 @09:30AM (#16168101)
Yes, because figuring out if you are actually sponsoring terrorism is hard. /s

No, the thing is advertisers do not want their brands associated with thing x. YouTube already has automated classifiers for demonetization. This is recognition that these classifiers do not work - from the side of advertisers.

Google could tell them "deal with it" and they'd probably oblige. The manual side was Google Preferred program.

Re:Changes to the YouTube Partner Program by nemothekid on Wednesday January 17, 2018 @10:55AM (#16168881)
Google had been telling them “deal with it” for years, until the advertisers banded together and threatened to stop spending on YouTube.

That watershed moment is what caused YouTube to develop the whole demonetization algorithim in the first place

Re:Changes to the YouTube Partner Program by wafflesraccoon on Wednesday January 17, 2018 @11:11AM (#16169028)
Source? I would like to read more about this.
Re:Changes to the YouTube Partner Program by z3t4 on Wednesday January 17, 2018 @09:03AM (#16167919)
Those brand advertisers really destroyed advertising on the web, with the help of bot clickers ... Pay per click !? Great we don't want clicks ... I got 1000 clicks! Nope, all bots! Advertising went from fully automated to fully manual. There's billions of dollars wasted on manual marketing, and I know many have tried, but if you can make advertising fully automatic again, there's your unicorn startup!
Re:Changes to the YouTube Partner Program by darepublic on Wednesday January 17, 2018 @01:59PM (#16170669)
I'm sure there are ways to detect real clickthrough vs fake? (via monitoring the behaviour of the visitor upon clicking through) Why isn't this the magic bullet (or unicorn) you speak of.
Re:Changes to the YouTube Partner Program by jacksmith21006 on Wednesday January 17, 2018 @02:19PM (#16170857)
It is hard with video because of the bandwidth needed to fake video views. Plus Google has logged in accounts often for YT which helps with detecting if a bot.
Re:Changes to the YouTube Partner Program by bryanrasmussen on Wednesday January 17, 2018 @07:16AM (#16167285)
Yeah, but wasn't jackass in suicide forest a high-performing video?
Re:Changes to the YouTube Partner Program by x0x0 on Wednesday January 17, 2018 @02:37PM (#16171027)
And as per the article, Google is now going to have a human being watch all those videos.