Re:TeaVM – Ahead-of-time transpiler of Java bytecode to Java...
by pjmlp on Friday January 05, 2018 @08:37AM
(#16078427)
So classical UNIX C compilers are now transpilers, because they always did text to text (C to Assembly), before forking to the assembler.
Re:TeaVM – Ahead-of-time transpiler of Java bytecode to Java...
by shakna on Friday January 05, 2018 @09:41AM
(#16078809)
The first AIX C compiler called itself a "transcompiler" in it's manual, so yes, they are.
Re:TeaVM – Ahead-of-time transpiler of Java bytecode to Java...
by pjmlp on Friday January 05, 2018 @12:26PM
(#16079977)
Any digitalized version of it available online?
Re:TeaVM – Ahead-of-time transpiler of Java bytecode to Java...
by shakna on Friday January 05, 2018 @03:19PM
(#16081315)
Not that I know of.
But you can see the term of the day, "translator", here[0][1], and it isn't much of a leap to see how that evolved into translator-compiler, and then shortened itself.
[0] XLT86, 8080 to 8086 Translator http://www.s100computers.com/Software%20Folder/Assembler%20C...
[1] Pg. 47, Trans Z80 to 8086 Translator http://www.patersontech.com/dos/Docs/86_Dos_usr_03.pdf
Transpilation: text to text (eg: Scheme to C)
Compilation: anything to anything but usually it implies text to binary code
transpilation is compilation but compilation is not necessary transpilation (the all squares are rectangles but all rectangles ...)