News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Statistics, we have a problem by tigershark on Saturday December 16, 2017 @12:37AM (#15937943)
To me it seems like a witch hunt nowadays. You need just an unverified comment to get fired and to wear a mark of blemish for life. When the mobs filled with "righteous hatred" are judge and jury of a non-existent trial we know that there is something scarily wrong with our society.
Re:Statistics, we have a problem by 1024core on Saturday December 16, 2017 @12:54AM (#15938014)
I hear these kinds of comments every time there's some pushback against such behavior.

Despite your shrill protestations, there is no "mob filled with righteous hatred" going around. Where action is being taken, it is with a preponderance of evidence.

Only those who have actually indulged in such behavior need to worry.

Re:Statistics, we have a problem by glogla on Saturday December 16, 2017 @11:46AM (#15940266)
Have you heard of donglegate?
Re:Statistics, we have a problem by tigershark on Saturday December 16, 2017 @01:04AM (#15938049)
Excuse me? How would you find "preponderance of evidence" for a leg touch? I'm genuinely curious. Once while I was stretching on my chair in the office I bumped inadvertently with one colleague that was passing behind me. Do you think that I should be fired and my career ended if she suddenly wrote in a blog post that I touched her?
Re:Statistics, we have a problem by emj on Saturday December 16, 2017 @05:40AM (#15938901)
That seems hypothetical, if you did that and sent private messages etc. then I do think there should be some repercussions. I've seen those accusations happen twice and no one got fired, but both victim quit shortly after. This did get an discussion going about how to deal with it, and there were very few people who thought it was a firing offence. I hope that is changing with younger more aware people getting into the workplace.
Re:Statistics, we have a problem by dang on Saturday December 16, 2017 @02:54AM (#15938412)
The blog post now linked to above describes much more and much worse than a "leg touch".
Re:Statistics, we have a problem by candiodari on Saturday December 16, 2017 @04:07AM (#15938593)
Plus it's not like for this individual there is any shortage of women testifying publicly and privately to his behavior.
Re:Statistics, we have a problem by mcguire on Saturday December 16, 2017 @08:47AM (#15939498)
"You need just an unverified comment to get fired and to wear a mark of blemish for life."

Do you have an example of that?

Re:Statistics, we have a problem by joshuamorton on Saturday December 16, 2017 @12:46AM (#15937975)
Has this guy been fired?
Re:Statistics, we have a problem by tigershark on Saturday December 16, 2017 @12:52AM (#15938001)
For now suspended, but do you reckon that his life and his career would proceed like before? I believe that he is finished. I don't think that he should go unscathed if he really behaved inappropriately, but between that and destroying him based on an unverified comment there is an ocean in the middle.
Re:Statistics, we have a problem by joshuamorton on Saturday December 16, 2017 @12:56PM (#15940689)
So you think that he'll be fired next week without Google verifying the allegations?
Re:Statistics, we have a problem by EliRivers on Saturday December 16, 2017 @05:14AM (#15938808)
Although we did already know that there is something scarily wrong with our society, given the ease with which many predators have routinely been molesting, coercing and raping for decades.