News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Internet traffic for Google, Facebook, Apple was briefly ... by riffic on Wednesday December 13, 2017 @04:01AM (#15913018)
Name and shame?
Re:Internet traffic for Google, Facebook, Apple was briefly ... by maltalex on Wednesday December 13, 2017 @05:21AM (#15913331)
Bad idea. These are customers he's talking about. If you want to stay in business, naming and shaming your customers isn't a good strategy.
Re:Internet traffic for Google, Facebook, Apple was briefly ... by a012 on Wednesday December 13, 2017 @04:43AM (#15913174)
Probably he's still working at there, so he'd be forbidden to disclose customers name.
Re:Internet traffic for Google, Facebook, Apple was briefly ... by dredmorbius on Wednesday December 13, 2017 @09:43AM (#15914481)
BGP peerings are publically published, that's how they work.

Knowing which customers fail to secure their comms is another matter.

Re:Internet traffic for Google, Facebook, Apple was briefly ... by a012 on Thursday December 14, 2017 @01:50AM (#15920415)
> Knowing which customers fail to secure their comms is another matter.

Exactly what I meant.

Re:Internet traffic for Google, Facebook, Apple was briefly ... by iDemonix on Wednesday December 13, 2017 @08:38AM (#15914081)
Sorry, no, I don’t really see how that contributes to the discussion.