News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Advances in number theory inspired by physics by qubex on Friday December 01, 2017 @04:01PM (#15827428)
Never heard of Oliver Heaveside and his operator despite using Laplace transforms on a regular basis for year. You learn something new every day. Thanks.
Re:Advances in number theory inspired by physics by ncmncm on Friday December 01, 2017 @05:48PM (#15828435)
Other reasons Heaviside is often ignored are that he was a commoner, and he published all his papers in a newspaper. He originated the theory of transmission lines (inventing the loading coils you still see hanging between telephone poles) and atmospheric radio propagation, both often credited to others. See Paul Nahin, "Oliver Heaviside: Sage in Solitude"
Re:Advances in number theory inspired by physics by Cyph0n on Friday December 01, 2017 @07:35PM (#15829160)
Now that's very interesting!

According to his wiki page, he reduced Maxwell's equations from 20 equations (in 20 variables) down to the 4 iconic equations we now refer to as Maxwell's equations. Imagine having to learn EM theory with 20 equations... as if current EM theory courses aren't tough enough already!

One of his creations, the step function, is also a key part of many proofs and equations in signal processing.

Re:Advances in number theory inspired by physics by ncmncm on Friday December 01, 2017 @08:01PM (#15829338)
It should be noted that Maxwell's quaternion formulation of the same relations has just two equations.

Vector notation won out over quaternions not from elegance or power, but from practical details of working them on paper. Now that we don't, anymore, quaternions are probably the better notation. Somebody should rewrite an E-M and an optics textbook.

Re:Advances in number theory inspired by physics by catnaroek on Friday December 01, 2017 @08:33PM (#15829516)
pls, we use tensor calculus and exterior algebra. More, precisely, the electromagnetic tensor is the exterior derivative of the 4-potential.
Re:Advances in number theory inspired by physics by kurthr on Friday December 01, 2017 @11:47PM (#15830214)
Exactly, vector calculus is a useful learning tool, but not used in most higher level (e.g. General Rel, plasma physics, etc) or numerical (super computer) physics calculations.

Raising and lowering Kartoffel symbols and their covariant derivative forms make manipulating the coordinate transforms possible (4-6 dimensional)... otherwise it would just look like pages of equations.

Interestingly, mechanical engineering also deals almost entirely with tensors... and they've developed extremely intuitive visualization tools.

Re:Advances in number theory inspired by physics by wbl on Saturday December 02, 2017 @10:15AM (#15832143)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christoffel_symbols is probably what you wanted to say
Re:Advances in number theory inspired by physics by kurthr on Saturday December 02, 2017 @03:18PM (#15833822)
Lol... german potatoes... autocorrect? Thanks, that's actually hilarious.
Re:Advances in number theory inspired by physics by mkl on Saturday December 02, 2017 @03:22AM (#15830899)
> Interestingly, mechanical engineering also deals almost entirely with tensors... and they've developed extremely intuitive visualization tools.

What visualisation tools are you referring to? That sounds interesting.

Re:Advances in number theory inspired by physics by kurthr on Saturday December 02, 2017 @03:33PM (#15833893)
Since all 3D stress/strains are tensor quantities (even for purely linear models), MEs project them into principal axes so that you can see their angle and their peak tesnsile/shear stress.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy_stress_tensor

Look at Mohr's circle:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohr%27s_circle

Within an object the stresses and strains (and principal components) vary as you move through it. That's part of what makes predicting failures and effects of thermal expansion so complex, etc difficult even ignoring nonlinear effects and failure modes (e.g. crack propagation).

Re:Advances in number theory inspired by physics by Cyph0n on Friday December 01, 2017 @08:34PM (#15829519)
Isn't a quaternion just a 3D representation of a vector in terms of the coordinate system's unit vectors? From what I recall, using such a representation makes it easier to perform transforms between coordinate systems.
Re:Advances in number theory inspired by physics by qubex on Saturday December 02, 2017 @12:01AM (#15830256)
Quaternions are four-dimensional, hence the radix quater, meaning “four”.
Re:Advances in number theory inspired by physics by qubex on Saturday December 02, 2017 @02:25AM (#15830741)
Yeah... let's also not forget that quaterion multiplication is noncommutative (AB≠︎B A), which makes theem an absolute pain to work with. This is why it made sense to reformulate them from Maxwell’s two to ythe then-prevailing twenty. Then they got reformulated in terms of 3-vector calculus (by Heavside, whose existence and achievements I was ignorant of until just a few hours ago, courtesy of Hacker News).
Re:Advances in number theory inspired by physics by nileshtrivedi on Saturday December 02, 2017 @03:05AM (#15830850)
Matrix multiplication is noncommutative too. What made quaternions so particularly painful?
Re:Advances in number theory inspired by physics by qubex on Saturday December 02, 2017 @09:39AM (#15831979)
They’re not particularly more painful than matrices (indeed you can represent quaterions as matrices, beyond their ”traditional” representation of a tuple of a scalar and a 3-vector), but there’s no point going through the pain since there’s alternative formulations of Maxwell’s laws (in terms of vectors) that are commutative and get you out of the pickle (at the expense of going from two to four equations).
Re:Advances in number theory inspired by physics by empath75 on Friday December 01, 2017 @11:49PM (#15830217)
What kind of newspaper publishes scientific papers?
Re:Advances in number theory inspired by physics by ncmncm on Saturday December 02, 2017 @12:45AM (#15830406)
I guess Nahin called it a newspaper because it came out on newsprint, folded over, weekly. It would be called a trade rag, these days, if we had those anymore.

https://books.google.com/books?id=ehJbAAAAYAAJ&dq=intitle%3A...

Re:Advances in number theory inspired by physics by Cyph0n on Friday December 01, 2017 @05:15PM (#15828166)
My diff equations textbook referred to it as the Heaviside operator. In my EE and control classes, it's called the Laplace transform.
Re:Advances in number theory inspired by physics by emmelaich on Friday December 01, 2017 @07:43PM (#15829218)
He's responsible for the form of Maxwell's equations that we use today.