Re:Wealthy SF residents to get private street back, despite ...
by tanderson92 on Wednesday November 29, 2017 @05:10PM
(#15811364)
I find the interesting question to be: if the homeowner were not rich would they have a sitting U.S. Senator write a letter on their behalf and have a special hearing to decide the issue? By the way, there were 549 other tax sales dispensed with in an identical manner.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Wealthy SF residents to get private street back, despite ...
by dvdhnt on Wednesday November 29, 2017 @05:27PM
(#15811494)
> if the homeowner were not rich would they have a sitting U.S. Senator write a letter on their behalf and have a special hearing to decide the issue?
Almost certainly not and I do believe that the Senator's interference is unethical.
Re:Wealthy SF residents to get private street back, despite ...
by cylinder714 on Wednesday November 29, 2017 @06:48PM
(#15812014)
I'm pretty sure Feinstein used to live on Presidio Terrace. Her longtime friend, the late Merla Zellerbach, lived there as well, so she has a personal interest in the situation.
Re:Wealthy SF residents to get private street back, despite ...
by cafard on Thursday November 30, 2017 @10:06AM
(#15816249)
All I can say is, write to your senator and find out. All officials elected to offices at or above the (big) city council level will have constituent-service staff.
Re:Wealthy SF residents to get private street back, despite ...
by HN15718653 on Wednesday November 29, 2017 @05:18PM
(#15811428)
How many were the sale of a private street that served 20+ residences?