News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: Fx - Poor man's serverless framework by Gys on Monday November 13, 2017 @12:06PM (#15687934)
Sorry if I mistunderstand. The readme is very limited. But this need a (vps or something) server that I own / manage ? It does not seem to upload the functions(s) to some cloud ?

In general I think 'serverless' means deploying code without managing some kind of server yourself.

Re:Show HN: Fx - Poor man's serverless framework by jensvdh on Monday November 13, 2017 @01:05PM (#15688477)
It's a poor man's readme
Re:Show HN: Fx - Poor man's serverless framework by quickthrower2 on Monday November 13, 2017 @08:43PM (#15691918)
Get your roomie to deploy it. Then it's serverless to you.
Re:Show HN: Fx - Poor man's serverless framework by metrue on Monday November 13, 2017 @08:29PM (#15691848)
Your guys are so right about fx’s ‘Poor man’s README, I will update it soon. Long story short, you can deploy fx on a host (cloud or localhost), then you can deploy a function to be a service in few seconds, just like AWS lambda ( but Poor man’s lambda).
Re:Show HN: Fx - Poor man's serverless framework by kennu on Monday November 13, 2017 @05:27PM (#15690880)
Even the README says you need to start a server. So it’s not quite serverless.

(“Serverless”, at least to me, means a platform where I don’t have to worry about running servers.)

Re:Show HN: Fx - Poor man's serverless framework by proc0 on Monday November 13, 2017 @05:57PM (#15691063)
I think serverless refers to the use of 'lamdas' as the unit of deployment, as oppose to containers or VM's, but someone else may want to add/edit that.
Re:Show HN: Fx - Poor man's serverless framework by metrue on Monday November 13, 2017 @08:06PM (#15691752)
README is not quiet clear, but for my understanding, lambda is kinda thing that helps you to do serverless, but lambda is also running on some kind of server maintained by AWS, right? fx is kind of lambda, but owned by yourself.
Re:Show HN: Fx - Poor man's serverless framework by kennu on Monday November 13, 2017 @10:08PM (#15692290)
Well, yes, you can run your own server to provide yourself a serverless platform, but it kind of defeats the purpose... Since then you end up having to maintain your server anyway.

I suppose there may be a point to it if the serverless platform is extremely stable and never has any security issues or other things to update.

Re:Show HN: Fx - Poor man's serverless framework by bitwize on Tuesday November 14, 2017 @09:30AM (#15695244)
Well, the server is abstracted away and vanishes in a puff of logic, you see.
Re:Show HN: Fx - Poor man's serverless framework by caust1c on Monday November 13, 2017 @11:37AM (#15687696)
Isn't this just `up`?

https://github.com/apex/up

Re:Show HN: Fx - Poor man's serverless framework by joshstrange on Monday November 13, 2017 @12:02PM (#15687904)
It looks like up for running something like express/koa/etc while fx is for functions (like AWS Lambda). They are both "serverless" but that's about all they share in common AFAICT. Thanks for mentioning "up" though, I'd never heard of it before, very cool.
Re:Show HN: Fx - Poor man's serverless framework by turtlebits on Monday November 13, 2017 @12:56PM (#15688390)
`up` looks like it only runs on AWS. This seems nice as the only requirement is docker and I can run it on my $3USD VPS
Re:Show HN: Fx - Poor man's serverless framework by tjholowaychuk on Monday November 13, 2017 @03:12PM (#15689772)
Yep it uses AWS Lambda currently, you'll usually end up paying < $1 for small side projects such as https://gh-polls.com/ etc, but it definitely depends on your traffic.

This project looks like it's more FaaS style (sans the self-healing / autoscaling etc). Up is more application oriented, it just happens to use Lambda.

Re:Show HN: Fx - Poor man's serverless framework by fiatjaf on Monday November 13, 2017 @01:28PM (#15688703)
Where do you get such a cheap VPS? I'm paying $5!
Re:Show HN: Fx - Poor man's serverless framework by e9 on Monday November 13, 2017 @03:40PM (#15690018)
I pay $2.5 per month here: https://www.vultr.com/?ref=7195281
Re:Show HN: Fx - Poor man's serverless framework by bespoke_engnr on Monday November 13, 2017 @05:07PM (#15690722)
I've had good experiences with Vultr as well. I'm surprised they're not more popular.
Re:Show HN: Fx - Poor man's serverless framework by doublerebel on Monday November 13, 2017 @06:37PM (#15691285)
Joyent offers very small and very efficient instances. I haven't paid $5 per instance in years.
Re:Show HN: Fx - Poor man's serverless framework by subway on Monday November 13, 2017 @11:39AM (#15687721)
But this one's written in... Oh.
Re:Show HN: Fx - Poor man's serverless framework by abiox on Monday November 13, 2017 @01:28PM (#15688705)
are you suggesting it's similar, or that it's a fork, or something else?