News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: Fx - Poor man's serverless framework by kennu on Monday November 13, 2017 @05:27PM (#15690880)
Even the README says you need to start a server. So it’s not quite serverless.

(“Serverless”, at least to me, means a platform where I don’t have to worry about running servers.)

Re:Show HN: Fx - Poor man's serverless framework by proc0 on Monday November 13, 2017 @05:57PM (#15691063)
I think serverless refers to the use of 'lamdas' as the unit of deployment, as oppose to containers or VM's, but someone else may want to add/edit that.
Re:Show HN: Fx - Poor man's serverless framework by metrue on Monday November 13, 2017 @08:06PM (#15691752)
README is not quiet clear, but for my understanding, lambda is kinda thing that helps you to do serverless, but lambda is also running on some kind of server maintained by AWS, right? fx is kind of lambda, but owned by yourself.
Re:Show HN: Fx - Poor man's serverless framework by kennu on Monday November 13, 2017 @10:08PM (#15692290)
Well, yes, you can run your own server to provide yourself a serverless platform, but it kind of defeats the purpose... Since then you end up having to maintain your server anyway.

I suppose there may be a point to it if the serverless platform is extremely stable and never has any security issues or other things to update.

Re:Show HN: Fx - Poor man's serverless framework by bitwize on Tuesday November 14, 2017 @09:30AM (#15695244)
Well, the server is abstracted away and vanishes in a puff of logic, you see.