Re:Show HN: Fx - Poor man's serverless framework
by joshstrange on Monday November 13, 2017 @12:02PM
(#15687904)
It looks like up for running something like express/koa/etc while fx is for functions (like AWS Lambda). They are both "serverless" but that's about all they share in common AFAICT. Thanks for mentioning "up" though, I'd never heard of it before, very cool.
Re:Show HN: Fx - Poor man's serverless framework
by turtlebits on Monday November 13, 2017 @12:56PM
(#15688390)
`up` looks like it only runs on AWS. This seems nice as the only requirement is docker and I can run it on my $3USD VPS
Re:Show HN: Fx - Poor man's serverless framework
by tjholowaychuk on Monday November 13, 2017 @03:12PM
(#15689772)
Yep it uses AWS Lambda currently, you'll usually end up paying < $1 for small side projects such as https://gh-polls.com/ etc, but it definitely depends on your traffic.
This project looks like it's more FaaS style (sans the self-healing / autoscaling etc). Up is more application oriented, it just happens to use Lambda.
Re:Show HN: Fx - Poor man's serverless framework
by fiatjaf on Monday November 13, 2017 @01:28PM
(#15688703)
Where do you get such a cheap VPS? I'm paying $5!
Re:Show HN: Fx - Poor man's serverless framework
by e9 on Monday November 13, 2017 @03:40PM
(#15690018)
I pay $2.5 per month here: https://www.vultr.com/?ref=7195281
Re:Show HN: Fx - Poor man's serverless framework
by bespoke_engnr on Monday November 13, 2017 @05:07PM
(#15690722)
I've had good experiences with Vultr as well. I'm surprised they're not more popular.
Re:Show HN: Fx - Poor man's serverless framework
by doublerebel on Monday November 13, 2017 @06:37PM
(#15691285)
Joyent offers very small and very efficient instances. I haven't paid $5 per instance in years.
https://github.com/apex/up