Re:Twitter says it could turn first-ever profit
by hxnjxn on Thursday October 26, 2017 @02:37PM
(#15561708)
He should be considered an exaggerated media story but that would be a bad look for the valley
Re:Twitter says it could turn first-ever profit
by WalterSear on Thursday October 26, 2017 @01:59PM
(#15561376)
"So if he's actually working 80 hours a week, where are the results?"
And here I am, trying to find just one job in tech that's only 40 hours a week.
Re:Twitter says it could turn first-ever profit
by wolco on Thursday October 26, 2017 @02:16PM
(#15561521)
Plenty of 80 hour a week jobs that pay 35.
Re:Twitter says it could turn first-ever profit
by cisanti on Friday October 27, 2017 @05:33AM
(#15566884)
Help me find a 20h/w job and I'll be grateful for the rest of my life.
Re:Twitter says it could turn first-ever profit
by perseusprime11 on Thursday October 26, 2017 @01:57PM
(#15561359)
Twitter was always making money. That was not their problem. Their big problem was spending 2 billion dollars. Cut spending and you will see net profit go up. He is atleast doing that while slowly starting to experiment with the product.
He's run both companies for awhile now, Twitter has basically been stagnant. Doesn't he supposedly work like 80 hours a week anyway? It's already a full time job. Examples from 2011 and 2016:
http://money.cnn.com/2011/11/13/technology/dorsey_techonomy/...
http://www.businessinsider.com/jack-dorsey-explains-his-18-h...
Here is he 5 years apart, marketing himself. So if he's actually working 80 hours a week, where are the results? What has Twitter done over the last seven years? He wants to have his cake and eat it, too, yeah?